Emergence and Effectiveness of Task Vectors in In-Context Learning: An Encoder Decoder Perspective
Seungwook Han, Jinyeop Song, Jeff Gore, Pulkit Agrawal
Abstract
Autoregressive transformers exhibit adaptive learning through in-context learning (ICL), which begs the question of how. Prior works have shown that transformers represent the ICL tasks as vectors in their representations. In this paper, we leverage the encoding-decoding framework to study how transformers form task vectors during pretraining and how their task encoding quality predicts ICL task performance. On synthetic ICL tasks, we analyze the training dynamics of a small transformer and report the coupled emergence of task encoding and decoding. As the model learns to encode different latent tasks (e.g., "Finding the first noun in a sentence.") into distinct, separable representations, it concurrently builds conditional decoding algorithms and improves its ICL performance. We validate this phenomenon across pretrained models of varying scales (Gemma-2 2B/9B/27B, Llama-3.1 8B/70B) and over the course of pretraining in OLMo-7B. Further, we demonstrate that the quality of task encoding inferred from representations predicts ICL performance, and that, surprisingly, finetuning the earlier layers can improve the task encoding and performance more than finetuning the latter layers. Our empirical insights shed light into better understanding the success and failure modes of large language models via their representations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d28a64b1-df2a-4865-97b4-6f43c05145efCited by top-tier papers4
- Do different prompting methods yield a common task representation in language models?Guy Davidson, Todd M. Gureckis, Brenden M. Lake, Adina WilliamsNeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
- Unifying Attention Heads and Task Vectors via Hidden State Geometry in In-Context LearningHaolin Yang, Hakaze Cho, Yiqiao Zhong, Naoya InoueNeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
- Causality ≠ Invariance: Function and Concept Vectors in LLMsGustaw Opielka, Hannes Rosenbusch, Claire E. StevensonICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- Task Vectors, Learned Not Extracted: Performance Gains and Mechanistic InsightsHaolin Yang, Hakaze Cho, Kaize Ding, Naoya InoueICLR 2026
Builds on30
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Transformers are RNNs: Fast Autoregressive Transformers with Linear AttentionAngelos Katharopoulos, Apoorv Vyas, Nikolaos Pappas, François FleuretICML 2020 · 2,665 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian InferenceSang Michael Xie, Aditi Raghunathan, Percy Liang, Tengyu MaICLR 2022 · 1,030 citations
- Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-DistributionAnanya Kumar, Aditi Raghunathan, Robbie Matthew Jones, Tengyu Ma et al.ICLR 2022 · 911 citations
Related papers
- Scaling Sparse Feature Circuits For Studying In-Context LearningDmitrii Kharlapenko, Stepan Shabalin, Arthur Conmy, Neel NandaICML 2025
- Where does In-context Learning Happen in Large Language Models?Suzanna Sia, David Mueller, Kevin DuhNeurIPS 2024 · 14 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders Reveal Temporal Difference Learning in Large Language ModelsCan Demircan, Tankred Saanum, Akshay Kumar Jagadish, Marcel Binz et al.ICLR 2025 · 1 citation
- Prior Forgetting and In-Context OverfittingSungyoon LeeNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Meta-learning via Language Model In-context TuningYanda Chen, Ruiqi Zhong, Sheng Zha, George Karypis et al.ACL 2022
