On the Relationship Between Activation Outliers and Feature Death in Sparse Autoencoders
Elana Simon, Etowah Adams, James Zou
Abstract
Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) decompose neural network activations into interpretable features, but many learned features never activate, a problem called feature death that wastes dictionary capacity and can reintroduce superposition. Death rates vary dramatically between models: near-zero on GPT-2, over 70% on AlphaFold3 with identical configurations. We find that dimension-level activation outliers (dimensions whose mean magnitude is large relative to per-token variation) cause this by shifting pre-activations at initialization based on each feature's alignment with the activation mean. Features anti-aligned with the mean receive permanently negative pre-activations and never fire. We formalize outlier severity as ; it predicts initial death rates (Spearman for dead-by-TopK, for dead-by-ReLU) across 454 model-layer combinations spanning language, vision, protein, and genomic models. Dead features can revive during training, but recovery requires the SAE bias to learn the activation mean, a process that is prohibitively slow at high . Mean-centering (subtracting the activation mean) sidesteps this and eliminates outlier-induced death across all tested models, confirming the mechanism and providing a principled basis for when and why this preprocessing step is necessary.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5dd88d3d-aef3-4f96-b212-758b569d1604Builds on15
- Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image SynthesisPatrick Esser, Sumith Kulal, Andreas Blattmann, Rahim Entezari et al.ICML 2024 · 3,620 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- Smarter, Better, Faster, Longer: A Modern Bidirectional Encoder for Fast, Memory Efficient, and Long Context Finetuning and InferenceBenjamin Warner, Antoine Chaffin, Benjamin Clavié, Orion Weller et al.ACL 2025 · 552 citations
- Transcoders find interpretable LLM feature circuitsJacob Dunefsky, Philippe Chlenski, Neel NandaNeurIPS 2024 · 222 citations
- Quantizable Transformers: Removing Outliers by Helping Attention Heads Do NothingYelysei Bondarenko, Markus Nagel, Tijmen BlankevoortNeurIPS 2023 · 196 citations
Related papers
- Dimensional Collapse in Transformer Attention Outputs: A Challenge for Sparse Dictionary LearningJunxuan Wang, Xuyang Ge, Wentao Shu, Zhengfu He et al.ICML 2026 · 5 citations
- A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse AutoencodersDavid Chanin, James Wilken-Smith, Tomás Dulka, Hardik Bhatnagar et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 168 citations
- Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencodersLeo Gao, Tom Dupré la Tour, Henk Tillman, Gabriel Goh et al.ICLR 2025 · 10 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders Trained on the Same Data Learn Different FeaturesGonçalo Paulo, Nora BelroseICLR 2026 · 96 citations
- Ensembling Sparse AutoencodersSoham Gadgil, Chris Lin, Su-In LeeICML 2026
