Clipping Improves Adam-Norm and AdaGrad-Norm when the Noise Is Heavy-Tailed
Savelii Chezhegov, Yaroslav Klyukin, Andrei Semenov, Aleksandr Beznosikov, Alexander V. Gasnikov, Samuel Horváth, Martin Takác, Eduard Gorbunov
Abstract
Methods with adaptive stepsizes, such as Ada-Grad and Adam, are essential for training modern Deep Learning models, especially Large Language Models. Typically, the noise in the stochastic gradients is heavy-tailed for the later ones. Gradient clipping provably helps to achieve good high-probability convergence for such noises. However, despite the similarity between Ada-Grad/Adam and Clip-SGD, the current understanding of the high-probability convergence of AdaGrad/Adam-type methods is limited in this case. In this work, we prove that AdaGrad/Adam (and their delayed version) can have provably bad high-probability convergence if the noise is heavy-tailed. We also show that gradient clipping fixes this issue, i.e., we derive new highprobability convergence bounds with polylogarithmic dependence on the confidence level for AdaGrad-Norm and Adam-Norm with clipping and with/without delay for smooth convex/nonconvex stochastic optimization with heavy-tailed noise. We extend our results to the case of Clip-AdaGrad/Clip-Adam with delayed stepsizes. Our empirical evaluations highlight the superiority of clipped versions of AdaGrad/Adam in handling the heavy-tailed noise.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0275915b-2caa-403b-bd67-8945682a0a1aCited by top-tier papers5
- Lions and Muons: Optimization via Stochastic Frank-Wolfe under Heavy-Tailed NoiseMaria-Eleni Sfyraki, Jun-Kun WangICML 2026 · 37 citations
- Enhancing LLM Training via Spectral ClippingXiaowen Jiang, Andrei Semenov, Sebastian StichICML 2026 · 4 citations
- Can Adaptive Gradient Methods Converge under Heavy-Tailed Noise? A Case Study of AdaGradZijian LiuICML 2026 · 3 citations
- From Optimization to Generalization under Heavy-Tailed Data: The Role of Gradient ClippingAleksandr Shestakov, Martin Takac, Eduard GorbunovICML 2026
- Stochastic Gradient Methods under Heavy-Tailed Noises in Weakly Convex OptimizationTianxi Zhu, Yi Xu, Qi Wang, Xiangyang JiICML 2026
Builds on11
- ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language RepresentationsZhenzhong Lan, Mingda Chen, Sebastian Goodman, Kevin Gimpel et al.ICLR 2020 · 7,418 citations
- On the Stability of Fine-tuning BERT: Misconceptions, Explanations, and Strong BaselinesMarius Mosbach, Maksym Andriushchenko, Dietrich KlakowICLR 2021 · 448 citations
- Stochastic Optimization with Heavy-Tailed Noise via Accelerated Gradient ClippingEduard Gorbunov, Marina Danilova, Alexander V. GasnikovNeurIPS 2020 · 181 citations
- Convergence of Adam Under Relaxed AssumptionsHaochuan Li, Alexander Rakhlin, Ali JadbabaieNeurIPS 2023 · 132 citations
- High-Probability Bounds for Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inequalities: the Case of Unbounded VarianceAbdurakhmon Sadiev, Marina Danilova, Eduard Gorbunov, Samuel Horváth et al.ICML 2023 · 68 citations
Related papers
- Why are Adaptive Methods Good for Attention Models?Jingzhao Zhang, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Andreas Veit, Seungyeon Kim et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 397 citations
- Clipping Makes Distributed and Federated Asynchronous SGD Robust to StragglersSamuel Erickson, Mikael JohanssonICML 2026
- Noise Is Not the Main Factor Behind the Gap Between Sgd and Adam on Transformers, But Sign Descent Might BeFrederik Kunstner, Jacques Chen, Jonathan Wilder Lavington, Mark SchmidtICLR 2023 · 5 citations
- Clipped Gradient Methods for Nonsmooth Convex Optimization under Heavy-Tailed Noise: A Refined AnalysisZijian LiuICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- Nonconvex Stochastic Optimization under Heavy-Tailed Noises: Optimal Convergence without Gradient ClippingZijian Liu, Zhengyuan ZhouICLR 2025
