Can Adaptive Gradient Methods Converge under Heavy-Tailed Noise? A Case Study of AdaGrad
Zijian Liu
Abstract
Many tasks in modern machine learning are observed to involve heavy-tailed gradient noise during the optimization process. To manage this realistic and challenging setting, new mechanisms, such as gradient clipping and gradient normalization, have been introduced to ensure the convergence of first-order algorithms. However, adaptive gradient methods, a famous class of modern optimizers that includes popular Adam and AdamW, often perform well even without any extra operations mentioned above. It is therefore natural to ask whether adaptive gradient methods can converge under heavy-tailed noise without any algorithmic changes. In this work, we take the first step toward answering this question by investigating a special case, AdaGrad, the origin of adaptive gradient methods. We provide the first provable convergence rate for AdaGrad in non-convex optimization when the tail index p satisfies 4/3 < p ≤ 2. Notably, this result is achieved without requiring any prior knowledge of p and is hence adaptive to the tail index. In addition, we develop an algorithm-dependent lower bound, suggesting that the existing minimax rate for heavy-tailed optimization is not attainable by AdaGrad. Lastly, we consider AdaGrad-Norm, a popular variant of AdaGrad in theoretical studies, and show an improved rate that holds for any 1 < p ≤ 2 under an extra mild assumption.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a122db6b-d48d-4c4e-b499-ff6b9c4beb23Builds on22
- Why Gradient Clipping Accelerates Training: A Theoretical Justification for AdaptivityJingzhao Zhang, Tianxing He, Suvrit Sra, Ali JadbabaieICLR 2020 · 598 citations
- Why are Adaptive Methods Good for Attention Models?Jingzhao Zhang, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Andreas Veit, Seungyeon Kim et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 397 citations
- Momentum Improves Normalized SGDAshok Cutkosky, Harsh MehtaICML 2020 · 177 citations
- Adam Can Converge Without Any Modification On Update RulesYushun Zhang, Congliang Chen, Naichen Shi, Ruoyu Sun et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 134 citations
- High-probability Bounds for Non-Convex Stochastic Optimization with Heavy TailsAshok Cutkosky, Harsh MehtaNeurIPS 2021 · 119 citations
Related papers
- Nonconvex Stochastic Optimization under Heavy-Tailed Noises: Optimal Convergence without Gradient ClippingZijian Liu, Zhengyuan ZhouICLR 2025
- Clipping Improves Adam-Norm and AdaGrad-Norm when the Noise Is Heavy-TailedSavelii Chezhegov, Yaroslav Klyukin, Andrei Semenov, Aleksandr Beznosikov et al.ICML 2025
- Stability and Generalization of Nonconvex Optimization with Heavy-Tailed NoiseHongxu Chen, Ke Wei, Xiaoming Yuan, Luo LuoICML 2026
- Second-order Optimization under Heavy-Tailed Noise: Hessian Clipping and Sample Complexity LimitsAbdurakhmon Sadiev, Peter Richtárik, Ilyas FatkhullinNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Decentralized Nonconvex Optimization under Heavy-Tailed Noise: Normalization and Optimal ConvergenceShuhua Yu, Dusan Jakovetic, Soummya KarICLR 2026 · 7 citations
