Stochastic Gradient Methods under Heavy-Tailed Noises in Weakly Convex Optimization
Tianxi Zhu, Yi Xu, Qi Wang, Xiangyang Ji
Abstract
An increasing number of studies have focused on stochastic first-order methods (SFOMs) under heavy-tailed gradient noises, which have been observed in the training of practical deep learning models. In this paper, we focus on two types of gradient noises: one is sub-Weibull noise, and the other is noise under the assumption that it has a bounded p-th central moment (p-BCM) with p ∈ (1, 2]. The latter is more challenging due to the occurrence of infinite variance when p ∈ (1, 2). Under these two gradient noise assumptions, the in-expectation and high-probability convergence of SFOMs have been extensively studied in the contexts of convex optimization and standard smooth optimization. However, for weakly convex objectives-a class that includes all Lipschitz-continuous convex objectives and smooth objectives-our understanding of the in-expectation and high-probability convergence of SFOMs under these two types of noises remains incomplete. We investigate the high-probability convergence of the vanilla stochastic subgradient descent (SsGD) method under sub-Weibull noises, as well as the highprobability and in-expectation convergence of clipped SsGD under the p-BCM noises. Both analyses are conducted in the context of weakly convex optimization. For weakly convex objectives that may be non-convex and non-smooth, our results demonstrate that the theoretical dependence of vanilla SsGD on the failure probability and number of iterations under sub-Weibull noises does not degrade compared to the case of smooth objectives. Under p-BCM noises, our findings indicate that the non-smoothness and non-convexity of weakly convex objectives do not impact the theoretical dependence of clipped SGD on the failure probability relative to the smooth case; however, the sample complexity we derived is worse than a well-known lower bound for smooth optimization.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ca674f66-8d6b-4ff2-b0cd-7e6406801eebBuilds on19
- Why Gradient Clipping Accelerates Training: A Theoretical Justification for AdaptivityJingzhao Zhang, Tianxing He, Suvrit Sra, Ali JadbabaieICLR 2020 · 598 citations
- Why are Adaptive Methods Good for Attention Models?Jingzhao Zhang, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Andreas Veit, Seungyeon Kim et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 397 citations
- Stochastic Optimization with Heavy-Tailed Noise via Accelerated Gradient ClippingEduard Gorbunov, Marina Danilova, Alexander V. GasnikovNeurIPS 2020 · 181 citations
- Momentum Improves Normalized SGDAshok Cutkosky, Harsh MehtaICML 2020 · 177 citations
- High-probability Bounds for Non-Convex Stochastic Optimization with Heavy TailsAshok Cutkosky, Harsh MehtaNeurIPS 2021 · 119 citations
Related papers
- High Probability Guarantees for Nonconvex Stochastic Gradient Descent with Heavy TailsShaojie Li, Yong LiuICML 2022 · 37 citations
- Clipped Gradient Methods for Nonsmooth Convex Optimization under Heavy-Tailed Noise: A Refined AnalysisZijian LiuICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- Robustness Analysis of Non-Convex Stochastic Gradient Descent using Biased ExpectationsKevin Scaman, Cédric MalherbeNeurIPS 2020 · 37 citations
- Nonconvex Stochastic Optimization under Heavy-Tailed Noises: Optimal Convergence without Gradient ClippingZijian Liu, Zhengyuan ZhouICLR 2025
- High-Probability Bounds for the Last Iterate of Clipped SGDSavelii Chezhegov, Daniela Angela Parletta, Andrea Paudice, Eduard GorbunovICLR 2026
