Optimization Can Learn Johnson Lindenstrauss Embeddings
Nikos Tsikouras, Constantine Caramanis, Christos Tzamos
Abstract
Embeddings play a pivotal role across various disciplines, offering compact representations of complex data structures. Randomized methods like Johnson-Lindenstrauss (JL) provide state-of-the-art and essentially unimprovable theoretical guarantees for achieving such representations. These guarantees are worst-case and in particular, neither the analysis, nor the algorithm, takes into account any potential structural information of the data. The natural question is: must we randomize? Could we instead use an optimization-based approach, working directly with the data? A first answer is no: as we show, the distance-preserving objective of JL has a non-convex landscape over the space of projection matrices, with many bad stationary points. But this is not the final answer. We present a novel method motivated by diffusion models, that circumvents this fundamental challenge: rather than performing optimization directly over the space of projection matrices, we use optimization over the larger space of random solution samplers, gradually reducing the variance of the sampler. We show that by moving through this larger space, our objective converges to a deterministic (zero variance) solution, avoiding bad stationary points. This method can also be seen as an optimization-based derandomization approach and is an idea and method that we believe can be applied to many other problems.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on5
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision TransformersMathilde Caron, Hugo Touvron, Ishan Misra, Hervé Jégou et al.ICCV 2021 · 8,921 citations
- Supervised Contrastive LearningPrannay Khosla, Piotr Teterwak, Chen Wang, Aaron Sarna et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 7,049 citations
- A Comprehensively Tight Analysis of Gradient Descent for PCAZhiqiang Xu, Ping LiNeurIPS 2021 · 6 citations
Related papers
- Faster Binary Embeddings for Preserving Euclidean DistancesJinjie Zhang, Rayan SaabICLR 2021 · 8 citations
- Sparse Dimensionality Reduction RevisitedMikael Møller Høgsgaard, Lior Kamma, Kasper Green Larsen, Jelani Nelson et al.ICML 2024 · 3 citations
- Newton-LESS: Sparsification without Trade-offs for the Sketched Newton UpdateMichal Derezinski, Jonathan Lacotte, Mert Pilanci, Michael W. MahoneyNeurIPS 2021 · 32 citations
- The Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma for Clustering and Subspace Approximation: From Coresets to Dimension ReductionMoses Charikar, Erik WaingartenSODA 2025 · 2 citations
- The Fast Johnson-Lindenstrauss Transform Is Even FasterOra Nova Fandina, Mikael Møller Høgsgaard, Kasper Green LarsenICML 2023 · 7 citations
