Lune

SODA2025Top-tier venue

The Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma for Clustering and Subspace Approximation: From Coresets to Dimension Reduction

Moses Charikar, Erik Waingarten

2025Year
2Citations
7Top-tier citations

Abstract

We study the effect of Johnson-Lindenstrauss transforms in various projective clustering problems, generalizing recent results which only applied to center-based clustering [MMR19]. We ask the general question: for a Euclidean optimization problem and an accuracy parameter ε ∈ (0, 1), what is the smallest target dimension t ∈ N such that a Johnson-Lindenstrauss transform Π : R d → R t preserves the cost of the optimal solution up to a (1+ε)-factor. We give a new technique which uses coreset constructions to analyze the effect of the Johnson-Lindenstrauss transform. Our technique, in addition applying to center-based clustering, improves on (or is the first to address) other Euclidean optimization problems, including:

• For (k, z)-subspace approximation: we show that t = Õ(zk 2 /ε 3 ) suffices, whereas the prior best bound, of O(k/ε 2 ), only applied to the case z = 2 [CEM + 15].

• For (k, z)-flat approximation: we show t = Õ(zk 2 /ε 3 ) suffices, completely removing the dependence on n from the prior bound Õ(zk 2 log n/ε 3 ) of [KR15].

• For (k, z)-line approximation: we show t = O((k log log n + z + log(1/ε))/ε 3 ) suffices, and ours is the first to give any dimension reduction result.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 839bb907-93c6-4ef3-b021-a2f5105078e5

Cited by top-tier papers7

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on7

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines