An Information-theoretic Approach to Prompt Engineering Without Ground Truth Labels
Taylor Sorensen, Joshua Robinson, Christopher Michael Rytting, Alexander Glenn Shaw, Kyle Jeffrey Rogers, Alexia Pauline Delorey, Mahmoud Khalil, Nancy Fulda, David Wingate
Abstract
Pre-trained language models derive substantial linguistic and factual knowledge from the massive corpora on which they are trained, and prompt engineering seeks to align these models to specific tasks. Unfortunately, existing prompt engineering methods require significant amounts of labeled data, access to model parameters, or both. We introduce a new method for selecting prompt templates without labeled examples and without direct access to the model. Specifically, over a set of candidate templates, we choose the template that maximizes the mutual information between the input and the corresponding model output. Across 8 datasets representing 7 distinct NLP tasks, we show that when a template has high mutual information, it also has high accuracy on the task. On the largest model, selecting prompts with our method gets 90% of the way from the average prompt accuracy to the best prompt accuracy and requires no ground truth labels.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 000abb91-aa7e-479d-a3d5-66ca393396d0Cited by top-tier papers51
- Implicit In-context LearningZhuowei Li, Zihao Xu, Ligong Han, Yunhe Gao et al.ICLR 2025 · 1,989 citations
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human BehaviorJoon Sung Park, Joseph C. O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2023 · 1,882 citations
- A Survey on In-context LearningQingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce Zheng et al.EMNLP 2024 · 479 citations
- Prompting Large Language Model for Machine Translation: A Case StudyBiao Zhang, Barry Haddow, Alexandra BirchICML 2023 · 402 citations
- Batch Calibration: Rethinking Calibration for In-Context Learning and Prompt EngineeringHan Zhou, Xingchen Wan, Lev Proleev, Diana Mincu et al.ICLR 2024 · 90 citations
Builds on9
- Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order SensitivityYao Lu, Max Bartolo, Alastair Moore, Sebastian Riedel et al.ACL 2022 · 1,494 citations
- True Few-Shot Learning with Language ModelsEthan Perez, Douwe Kiela, Kyunghyun ChoNeurIPS 2021 · 547 citations
- Differentiable Prompt Makes Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot LearnersNingyu Zhang, Luoqiu Li, Xiang Chen, Shumin Deng et al.ICLR 2022 · 205 citations
- A Mutual Information Maximization Perspective of Language Representation LearningLingpeng Kong, Cyprien de Masson d'Autume, Lei Yu, Wang Ling et al.ICLR 2020 · 179 citations
- The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt TuningBrian Lester, Rami Al-Rfou, Noah ConstantEMNLP 2021 · 94 citations
Related papers
- Interactive and Visual Prompt Engineering for Ad-hoc Task Adaptation with Large Language ModelsHendrik Strobelt, Albert Webson, Victor Sanh, Benjamin Hoover et al.IEEE VIS 2022 · 191 citations
- Parallel Structures in Pre-training Data Yield In-Context LearningYanda Chen, Chen Zhao, Zhou Yu, Kathleen R. McKeown et al.ACL 2024 · 1 citation
- Pre-trained Language Models Can be Fully Zero-Shot LearnersXuandong Zhao, Siqi Ouyang, Zhiguo Yu, Ming Wu et al.ACL 2023 · 22 citations
- Weighted Multi-Prompt Learning with Description-free Large Language Model DistillationSua Lee, Kyubum Shin, Jung Ho ParkICLR 2025
- AutoPrompt: Eliciting Knowledge from Language Models with Automatically Generated PromptsTaylor Shin, Yasaman Razeghi, Robert L. Logan IV, Eric Wallace et al.EMNLP 2020 · 1,162 citations
