ACL Findings2022
Cutting Down on Prompts and Parameters: Simple Few-Shot Learning with Language Models
Robert L. Logan IV, Ivana Balazevic, Eric Wallace, Fabio Petroni, Sameer Singh, Sebastian Riedel
Abstract
Prompting language models (LMs) with training examples and task descriptions has been seen as critical to recent successes in few-shot learning. In this work, we show that finetuning LMs in the few-shot setting can considerably reduce the need for prompt engineering. In fact, one can use null prompts, prompts that contain neither task-specific templates nor training examples, and achieve competitive accuracy to manually-tuned prompts across a wide range of tasks. While finetuning LMs does introduce new parameters for each downstream task, we show that this memory overhead can be substantially reduced-finetuning only the bias terms can achieve comparable or better accuracy than standard finetuning while only updating 0.1% of the parameters. All in all, we recommend finetuning LMs for few-shot learning as it is more accurate, has relatively stable performance across different prompts, and can be made nearly as efficient as using frozen LMs.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 44 top-tier papers that cite it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers44
- Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task GeneralizationVictor Sanh, Albert Webson, Colin Raffel, Stephen H. Bach et al.ICLR 2022 · 1,976 citations
- Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?Sewon Min, Xinxi Lyu, Ari Holtzman, Mikel Artetxe et al.EMNLP 2022 · 634 citations
- Generating Training Data with Language Models: Towards Zero-Shot Language UnderstandingYu Meng, Jiaxin Huang, Yu Zhang, Jiawei HanNeurIPS 2022 · 309 citations
- Noisy Channel Language Model Prompting for Few-Shot Text ClassificationSewon Min, Mike Lewis, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Luke ZettlemoyerACL 2022 · 237 citations
- An LLM can Fool Itself: A Prompt-Based Adversarial AttackXilie Xu, Keyi Kong, Ning Liu, Lizhen Cui et al.ICLR 2024 · 146 citations
Builds on10
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language RepresentationsZhenzhong Lan, Mingda Chen, Sebastian Goodman, Kevin Gimpel et al.ICLR 2020 · 7,418 citations
- Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-shot Performance of Language ModelsZihao Zhao, Eric Wallace, Shi Feng, Dan Klein et al.ICML 2021 · 1,843 citations
- Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order SensitivityYao Lu, Max Bartolo, Alastair Moore, Sebastian Riedel et al.ACL 2022 · 1,494 citations
- AutoPrompt: Eliciting Knowledge from Language Models with Automatically Generated PromptsTaylor Shin, Yasaman Razeghi, Robert L. Logan IV, Eric Wallace et al.EMNLP 2020 · 1,162 citations
Related papers
- True Few-Shot Learning with Language ModelsEthan Perez, Douwe Kiela, Kyunghyun ChoNeurIPS 2021 · 547 citations
- Prompt-free and Efficient Few-shot Learning with Language ModelsRabeeh Karimi Mahabadi, Luke Zettlemoyer, James Henderson, Lambert Mathias et al.ACL 2022 · 76 citations
- PPT: Pre-trained Prompt Tuning for Few-shot LearningYuxian Gu, Xu Han, Zhiyuan Liu, Minlie HuangACL 2022
- Automated Few-Shot Classification with Instruction-Finetuned Language ModelsRami Aly, Xingjian Shi, Kaixiang Lin, Aston Zhang et al.EMNLP Findings 2023 · 3 citations
- The Benefits of Label-Description Training for Zero-Shot Text ClassificationLingyu Gao, Debanjan Ghosh, Kevin GimpelEMNLP 2023 · 6 citations
