Run a literature review

A repeatable literature review grounded in top-tier conference papers, abstracts, citation context, and available full text. Paste this into a chat with Lune connected:

You're helping me draft a literature review on <topic>.
 
1. Search Lune for the topic. Pull about 20 candidates.
2. Pick the 5 most-cited recent papers from top venues.
3. For each, look up the abstract and a one-hop slice of its citations.
4. Write me a markdown summary with three sections: Background, Recent
   advances, Open questions. Cite each claim inline by paper title;
   include a final references list with title, authors, venue, year,
   and the link Lune returned.

Tips

• Be narrow with the topic. "Vision-language model alignment 2025" produces a tighter review than "AI safety."
• If you want classic papers, say so. Add "include foundational work since 2010" to the prompt.
• Full text isn't always available. Where it is, the assistant can quote sections directly. Where it isn't, it'll fall back to the abstract, and the bibliography stays accurate either way.

What it costs

Roughly 6 to 10 requests per review: one search, a citation lookup for each of the five papers, and a few full-text reads. If the agent searches with search_papers_many, add one request per query variant, usually 5 to 8. On the Free plan, one review uses most or all of the day's 10 requests, and welcome credits or a credit pack cover anything past that. Pro and Max leave room for many reviews a day.