Zero-Cost Proxies for Lightweight NAS
Mohamed S. Abdelfattah, Abhinav Mehrotra, Lukasz Dudziak, Nicholas Donald Lane
摘要
Neural Architecture Search (NAS) is quickly becoming the standard methodology to design neural network models. However, NAS is typically compute-intensive because multiple models need to be evaluated before choosing the best one. To reduce the computational power and time needed, a proxy task is often used for evaluating each model instead of full training. In this paper, we evaluate conventional reduced-training proxies and quantify how well they preserve ranking between multiple models during search when compared with the rankings produced by final trained accuracy. We propose a series of zero-cost proxies, based on recent pruning literature, that use just a single minibatch of training data to compute a model's score. Our zero-cost proxies use 3 orders of magnitude less computation but can match and even outperform conventional proxies. For example, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between final validation accuracy and our best zero-cost proxy on NAS-Bench-201 is 0.82, compared to 0.61 for EcoNAS (a recently proposed reduced-training proxy). Finally, we use these zero-cost proxies to enhance existing NAS search algorithms such as random search, reinforcement learning, evolutionary search and predictor-based search. For all search methodologies and across three different NAS datasets, we are able to significantly improve sample efficiency, and thereby decrease computation, by using our zero-cost proxies. For example on NAS-Bench-101, we achieved the same accuracy 4 quicker than the best previous result. Our code is made public at: https://github.com/mohsaied/zero-cost-nas.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper93
- Neural Architecture Search without TrainingJoe Mellor, Jack Turner, Amos Storkey, Elliot J. CrowleyICML 2021 · 被引用 477 次
- How Powerful are Performance Predictors in Neural Architecture Search?Colin White, Arber Zela, Robin Ru, Yang Liu 等NeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 168 次
- Zen-NAS: A Zero-Shot NAS for High-Performance Image RecognitionMing Lin, Pichao Wang, Zhenhong Sun, Hesen Chen 等ICCV 2021 · 被引用 164 次
- Surrogate NAS Benchmarks: Going Beyond the Limited Search Spaces of Tabular NAS BenchmarksArber Zela, Julien Niklas Siems, Lucas Zimmer, Jovita Lukasik 等ICLR 2022 · 被引用 100 次
- Evaluating Efficient Performance Estimators of Neural ArchitecturesXuefei Ning, Changcheng Tang, Wenshuo Li, Zixuan Zhou 等NeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 99 次
它引用的顶会 Paper9
- Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowHidenori Tanaka, Daniel Kunin, Daniel L. K. Yamins, Surya GanguliNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 884 次
- NAS-Bench-201: Extending the Scope of Reproducible Neural Architecture SearchXuanyi Dong, Yi YangICLR 2020 · 被引用 825 次
- Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient FlowChaoqi Wang, Guodong Zhang, Roger B. GrosseICLR 2020 · 被引用 743 次
- Neural Architecture Search without TrainingJoe Mellor, Jack Turner, Amos Storkey, Elliot J. CrowleyICML 2021 · 被引用 477 次
- BRP-NAS: Prediction-based NAS using GCNsLukasz Dudziak, Thomas Chau, Mohamed S. Abdelfattah, Royson Lee 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 233 次
相关 Paper
- ReNAS: Relativistic Evaluation of Neural Architecture SearchYixing Xu, Yunhe Wang, Kai Han, Yehui Tang 等CVPR 2021
- EcoNAS: Finding Proxies for Economical Neural Architecture SearchDongzhan Zhou, Xinchi Zhou, Wenwei Zhang, Chen Change Loy 等CVPR 2020
- Extensible and Efficient Proxy for Neural Architecture SearchYuhong Li, Jiajie Li, Cong Hao, Pan Li 等ICCV 2023 · 被引用 8 次
- Surprisingly Strong Performance Prediction with Neural Graph FeaturesGabriela Kadlecová, Jovita Lukasik, Martin Pilát, Petra Vidnerová 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 12 次
- EZNAS: Evolving Zero-Cost Proxies For Neural Architecture ScoringYash Akhauri, Juan Pablo Muñoz, Nilesh Jain, Ravi IyerNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 15 次
