Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flow
Hidenori Tanaka, Daniel Kunin, Daniel L. K. Yamins, Surya Ganguli
摘要
Pruning the parameters of deep neural networks has generated intense interest due to potential savings in time, memory and energy both during training and at test time. Recent works have identified, through an expensive sequence of training and pruning cycles, the existence of winning lottery tickets or sparse trainable subnetworks at initialization. This raises a foundational question: can we identify highly sparse trainable subnetworks at initialization, without ever training, or indeed without ever looking at the data? We provide an affirmative answer to this question through theory driven algorithm design. We first mathematically formulate and experimentally verify a conservation law that explains why existing gradient-based pruning algorithms at initialization suffer from layer-collapse, the premature pruning of an entire layer rendering a network untrainable. This theory also elucidates how layer-collapse can be entirely avoided, motivating a novel pruning algorithm Iterative Synaptic Flow Pruning (SynFlow). This algorithm can be interpreted as preserving the total flow of synaptic strengths through the network at initialization subject to a sparsity constraint. Notably, this algorithm makes no reference to the training data and consistently competes with or outperforms existing state-of-the-art pruning algorithms at initialization over a range of models (VGG and ResNet), datasets (CIFAR-10/100 and Tiny ImageNet), and sparsity constraints (up to 99.99 percent). Thus our data-agnostic pruning algorithm challenges the existing paradigm that, at initialization, data must be used to quantify which synapses are important.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper229
- Neural Architecture Search without TrainingJoe Mellor, Jack Turner, Amos Storkey, Elliot J. CrowleyICML 2021 · 被引用 477 次
- Model Sparsity Can Simplify Machine UnlearningJinghan Jia, Jiancheng Liu, Parikshit Ram, Yuguang Yao 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 293 次
- Pruning Neural Networks at Initialization: Why Are We Missing the Mark?Jonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Daniel M. Roy, Michael CarbinICLR 2021 · 被引用 261 次
- CHIP: CHannel Independence-based Pruning for Compact Neural NetworksYang Sui, Miao Yin, Yi Xie, Huy Phan 等NeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 198 次
- How Powerful are Performance Predictors in Neural Architecture Search?Colin White, Arber Zela, Robin Ru, Yang Liu 等NeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 168 次
它引用的顶会 Paper8
- Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket HypothesisJonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Daniel M. Roy, Michael CarbinICML 2020 · 被引用 750 次
- Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient FlowChaoqi Wang, Guodong Zhang, Roger B. GrosseICLR 2020 · 被引用 743 次
- Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets WinnersUtku Evci, Trevor Gale, Jacob Menick, Pablo Samuel Castro 等ICML 2020 · 被引用 723 次
- Drawing Early-Bird Tickets: Toward More Efficient Training of Deep NetworksHaoran You, Chaojian Li, Pengfei Xu, Yonggan Fu 等ICLR 2020 · 被引用 282 次
- A Signal Propagation Perspective for Pruning Neural Networks at InitializationNamhoon Lee, Thalaiyasingam Ajanthan, Stephen Gould, Philip H. S. TorrICLR 2020 · 被引用 174 次
相关 Paper
- On the Predictability of Pruning Across ScalesJonathan S. Rosenfeld, Jonathan Frankle, Michael Carbin, Nir ShavitICML 2021 · 被引用 47 次
- Gradient Flow in Sparse Neural Networks and How Lottery Tickets WinUtku Evci, Yani Ioannou, Cem Keskin, Yann N. DauphinAAAI 2022 · 被引用 106 次
- Sanity-Checking Pruning Methods: Random Tickets can Win the JackpotJingtong Su, Yihang Chen, Tianle Cai, Tianhao Wu 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 100 次
- Finding Lottery Tickets in Vision Models via Data-Driven Spectral Foresight PruningLeonardo Iurada, Marco Ciccone, Tatiana TommasiCVPR 2024
- Robust Pruning at InitializationSoufiane Hayou, Jean-Francois Ton, Arnaud Doucet, Yee Whye TehICLR 2021 · 被引用 50 次
