Flexible and Expressive Typed Path Patterns for GQL
Wenjia Ye, Matías Toro, Tomás Díaz, Bruno C. d. S. Oliveira, Manuel Rigger, Claudio Gutierrez, Domagoj Vrgoc
摘要
Graph databases have become an important data management technology across various domains, including biology, sociology, industry ( e.g . fraud detection, supply chain management, financial services), and investigative journalism, due to their ability to efficiently store and query large-scale knowledge graphs and networks. Recently, the Graph Query Language (GQL) was introduced as a new ISO standard providing a unified framework for querying graphs. However, this initial specification lacks a formal type system for query validation. As a result, queries can fail at runtime due to type inconsistencies or produce empty results without prior warning. Solving this issue would help users write correct queries, especially on large datasets. To address this gap, we introduce a formal type model for a core fragment of GQL extended with property-based filtering and imprecise types both in the schema and the queries. This model, named FPPC, enables static detection of semantically incorrect and stuck queries, improving user feedback. We establish key theoretical properties, including emptiness (detecting empty queries due to type mismatches) and type safety (guaranteeing that well-typed queries do not fail at runtime). Additionally, we prove a gradual guarantee , ensuring that removing type annotations either does not introduce static type errors or only increases the result set. By integrating imprecision into GQL, FPPC offers a flexible solution for handling schema evolution and incomplete type information. This work contributes to making GQL more robust, improving both its usability and its formal foundation.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper7
- Incorrectness logicPeter W. O'HearnPOPL 2020 · 被引用 122 次
- Finding real bugs in big programs with incorrectness logicQuang Loc Le, Azalea Raad, Jules Villard, Josh Berdine 等OOPSLA 2022 · 被引用 52 次
- Detecting Logic Bugs in Graph Database Management Systems via Injective and Surjective Graph Query TransformationYuancheng Jiang, Jiahao Liu, Jinsheng Ba, Roland H. C. Yap 等ICSE 2024 · 被引用 14 次
- Abstracting gradual typing moving forward: precise and space-efficientFelipe Bañados Schwerter, Alison M. Clark, Khurram A. Jafery, Ronald GarciaPOPL 2021 · 被引用 13 次
- Covering All the Bases: Type-Based Verification of Test Input GeneratorsZhe Zhou, Ashish Mishra, Benjamin Delaware, Suresh JagannathanPLDI 2023 · 被引用 7 次
相关 Paper
- GQL and SQL/PGQ: Theoretical Models and Expressive PowerAmélie Gheerbrant, Leonid Libkin, Liat Peterfreund, Alexandra RogovaVLDB 2025 · 被引用 16 次
- Computing Why-Provenance for Property Graph QueriesKoumudi Ganepola, Maxime Jakubowski, Katja HoseVLDB 2026
- Adaptive Text2GQL: Integrating Structural Twig Linking and Evolutionary In-Context LearningFang Niu, Chaokun Wang, Hang Zhang, Songyao WangACL 2026
- Transforming Property GraphsAngela Bonifati, Filip Murlak, Yann RamusatVLDB 2024 · 被引用 9 次
- Repairing Property Graphs under PG-ConstraintsChristopher Spinrath, Angela Bonifati, Rachid EchahedVLDB 2026 · 被引用 1 次
