Computing Why-Provenance for Property Graph Queries
Koumudi Ganepola, Maxime Jakubowski, Katja Hose
摘要
Labeled Property Graphs (LPGs) have gained widespread adoption, supported by the ongoing standardization of the Graph Query Language (GQL). As LPGs are frequently constructed through the integration of heterogeneous data sources, inconsistencies and errors may propagate into query results. To explain and validate such results, it is essential to determine which parts of the input graph contributed to a given answer - an aspect captured by data provenance. In this paper, we present a formal definition of why-provenance tailored specifically to GQL, characterizing the fine-grained subgraph that contribute to a query answer. Building on the Core-GQL algebraic foundation, we further propose an efficient query-rewriting-based algorithm for computing provenance, leveraging the native execution capabilities of existing GQL-compliant graph database systems. Our extensive experimental evaluation demonstrates the feasibility and scalability of our approach, showing that provenance can be computed with moderate overhead that scales effectively with graph size.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper1
相关 Paper
- GQL and SQL/PGQ: Theoretical Models and Expressive PowerAmélie Gheerbrant, Leonid Libkin, Liat Peterfreund, Alexandra RogovaVLDB 2025 · 被引用 16 次
- MGQL: An Executable, Small-Step Semantics of GQLAditya Thimmaiah, Tong-Nong Lin, Milos GligoricOOPSLA 2026
- Transforming Property GraphsAngela Bonifati, Filip Murlak, Yann RamusatVLDB 2024 · 被引用 9 次
- Repairing Property Graphs under PG-ConstraintsChristopher Spinrath, Angela Bonifati, Rachid EchahedVLDB 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Flexible and Expressive Typed Path Patterns for GQLWenjia Ye, Matías Toro, Tomás Díaz, Bruno C. d. S. Oliveira 等OOPSLA 2025 · 被引用 1 次
