Fine-Tuning Enhances Existing Mechanisms: A Case Study on Entity Tracking
Nikhil Prakash, Tamar Rott Shaham, Tal Haklay, Yonatan Belinkov, David Bau
摘要
Fine-tuning on generalized tasks such as instruction following, code generation, and mathematics has been shown to enhance language models' performance on a range of tasks. Nevertheless, explanations of how such fine-tuning influences the internal computations in these models remain elusive. We study how fine-tuning affects the internal mechanisms implemented in language models. As a case study, we explore the property of entity tracking, a crucial facet of language comprehension, where models fine-tuned on mathematics have substantial performance gains. We identify the mechanism that enables entity tracking and show that (i) in both the original model and its fine-tuned versions primarily the same circuit implements entity tracking. In fact, the entity tracking circuit of the original model on the fine-tuned versions performs better than the full original model. (ii) The circuits of all the models implement roughly the same functionality: Entity tracking is performed by tracking the position of the correct entity in both the original model and its fine-tuned versions. (iii) Performance boost in the fine-tuned models is primarily attributed to its improved ability to handle the augmented positional information. To uncover these findings, we employ: Patch Patching, DCM, which automatically detects model components responsible for specific semantics, and CMAP, a new approach for patching activations across models to reveal improved mechanisms. Our findings suggest that fine-tuning enhances, rather than fundamentally alters, the mechanistic operation of the model.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper50
- Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single DirectionAndy Arditi, Oscar Obeso, Aaquib Syed, Daniel Paleka 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 1,166 次
- Mechanistically analyzing the effects of fine-tuning on procedurally defined tasksSamyak Jain, Robert Kirk, Ekdeep Singh Lubana, Robert P. Dick 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 108 次
- LLMs Encode Harmfulness and Refusal SeparatelyJiachen Zhao, Jing Huang, Zhengxuan Wu, David Bau 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 93 次
- Persona Features Control Emergent MisalignmentMiles Wang, Tom Dupré la Tour, Olivia Watkins, Aleksandar Makelov 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 81 次
- How do Language Models Bind Entities in Context?Jiahai Feng, Jacob SteinhardtICLR 2024 · 被引用 81 次
它引用的顶会 Paper24
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 24,707 次
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu 等ICLR 2022 · 被引用 18,833 次
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 3,415 次
- LIMA: Less Is More for AlignmentChunting Zhou, Pengfei Liu, Puxin Xu, Srinivasan Iyer 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 1,486 次
- Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-DistributionAnanya Kumar, Aditi Raghunathan, Robbie Matthew Jones, Tengyu Ma 等ICLR 2022 · 被引用 911 次
相关 Paper
- Entity Tracking in Language ModelsNajoung Kim, Sebastian SchusterACL 2023 · 被引用 9 次
- Dynamic Weight Grafting: Localizing Finetuned Factual Knowledge in TransformersTodd Nief, David Reber, Sean M. Richardson, Ari HoltzmanICLR 2026 · 被引用 3 次
- Interpretability of Language Models via Task SpacesLucas Weber, Jaap Jumelet, Elia Bruni, Dieuwke HupkesACL 2024
- Interpret and Improve In-Context Learning via the Lens of Input-Label MappingsChenghao Sun, Zhen Huang, Yonggang Zhang, Le Lu 等ACL 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- Do Language Models Track Entities Across State Changes?Zilu Tang, Qiao Zhao, Gabriel Franco, Derry Wijaya 等ICML 2026
