Persona Features Control Emergent Misalignment
Miles Wang, Tom Dupré la Tour, Olivia Watkins, Aleksandar Makelov, Ryan A. Chi, Samuel Miserendino, Jeffrey Wang, Achyuta Rajaram, Johannes Heidecke, Tejal Patwardhan, Daniel Mossing
摘要
Understanding how language models generalize behaviors from their training to a broader deployment distribution is an important problem in AI safety. Betley et al. (2025b) discovered that fine-tuning GPT-4o on intentionally insecure code causes "emergent misalignment," where models give stereotypically malicious responses to unrelated prompts. We extend this work, demonstrating emergent misalignment across diverse conditions, including reinforcement learning on reasoning models, fine-tuning on various synthetic datasets, and in models without safety training. To investigate the mechanisms behind this generalized misalignment, we apply a "model diffing" approach using sparse autoencoders to compare internal model representations before and after fine-tuning. This approach reveals several "misaligned persona" features in activation space, including a toxic persona feature which most strongly controls emergent misalignment and can be used to predict whether a model will exhibit such behavior. Additionally, we investigate mitigation strategies, discovering that fine-tuning an emergently misaligned model on just a few hundred benign samples efficiently restores alignment.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper10
- Steering Out-of-Distribution Generalization with Concept Ablation Fine-TuningHelena Casademunt, Caden Juang, Adam Karvonen, Samuel Marks 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 32 次
- Monitoring MonitorabilityMelody Guan, Miles Wang, Micah Carroll, Zehao Dou 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 26 次
- Emergent Misalignment is Easy, Narrow Misalignment is HardAnna Soligo, Edward Turner, Senthooran Rajamanoharan, Neel NandaICLR 2026 · 被引用 25 次
- In-Training Defenses Against Emergent Misalignment in Language ModelsDavid Kaczér, Magnus Jørgenvåg, Clemens Vetter, Esha Afzal 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 13 次
- Subliminal Effects in Your Data: A General Mechanism via Log-LinearityIshaq Aden-Ali, Noah Golowich, Allen Liu, Abhishek Shetty 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 6 次
它引用的顶会 Paper19
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 24,707 次
- Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single DirectionAndy Arditi, Oscar Obeso, Aaquib Syed, Daniel Paleka 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 1,166 次
- Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!Xiangyu Qi, Yi Zeng, Tinghao Xie, Pin-Yu Chen 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 1,104 次
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 1,072 次
- Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak SupervisionCollin Burns, Pavel Izmailov, Jan Hendrik Kirchner, Bowen Baker 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 443 次
相关 Paper
- Emergent Misalignment: Narrow finetuning can produce broadly misaligned LLMsJan Betley, Daniel Chee Hian Tan, Niels Warncke, Anna Sztyber-Betley 等ICML 2025
- Understanding Emergent Misalignment via Feature Superposition GeometryGouki Minegishi, Hiroki Furuta, Takeshi Kojima, Yusuke Iwasawa 等ACL 2026 · 被引用 3 次
- Keeping LLMs Aligned After Fine-tuning: The Crucial Role of Prompt TemplatesKaifeng Lyu, Haoyu Zhao, Xinran Gu, Dingli Yu 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 131 次
- Emergent Misalignment via In-Context Learning: Narrow in-context examples can produce broadly misaligned LLMsNikita Afonin, Nikita Andriyanov, Vahagn Hovhannisyan, Nikhil Bageshpura 等ACL 2026 · 被引用 12 次
- Narrow Finetuning Leaves Clearly Readable Traces in Activation DifferencesJulian Minder, Clément Dumas, Stewart Slocum, Helena Casademunt 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 29 次
