Axiomatic hardware-software contracts for security
Nicholas Mosier, Hanna Lachnitt, Hamed Nemati, Caroline Trippel
摘要
We propose leakage containment models (LCMs)---novel axiomatic security contracts which support formally reasoning about the security guarantees of programs when they run on particular microarchitectures. Our core contribution is an axiomatic vocabulary for formalizing LCMs, derived from the established axiomatic vocabulary for formalizing processor memory consistency models. Using this vocabulary, we formalize microarchitectural leakage---focusing on leakage through hardware memory systems---so that it can be automatically detected in programs and provide a taxonomy for classifying said leakage by severity. To illustrate the efficacy of LCMs, we first demonstrate that our leakage definition faithfully captures a sampling of (transient and non-transient) microarchitectural attacks from the literature. Second, we develop a static analysis tool based on LCMs which automatically identifies Spectre vulnerabilities in programs and scales to analyze real-world crypto-libraries.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper15
- Pensieve: Microarchitectural Modeling for Security EvaluationYuheng Yang, Thomas Bourgeat, Stella Lau, Mengjia YanISCA 2023 · 被引用 23 次
- Specification and Verification of Side-channel Security for Open-source Processors via Leakage ContractsZilong Wang, Gideon Mohr, Klaus von Gleissenthall, Jan Reineke 等CCS 2023 · 被引用 20 次
- Serberus: Protecting Cryptographic Code from Spectres at Compile-TimeNicholas Mosier, Hamed Nemati, John C. Mitchell, Caroline TrippelS&P 2024 · 被引用 16 次
- "These results must be false": A usability evaluation of constant-time analysis toolsMarcel Fourné, Daniel De Almeida Braga, Jan Jancar, Mohamed Sabt 等USENIX Security 2024 · 被引用 15 次
- RTL Verification for Secure Speculation Using Contract Shadow LogicQinhan Tan, Yuheng Yang, Thomas Bourgeat, Sharad Malik 等ASPLOS 2025 · 被引用 12 次
它引用的顶会 Paper18
- Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative ExecutionPaul Kocher, Jann Horn, Anders Fogh, Daniel Genkin 等S&P 2019 · 被引用 2,435 次
- ZombieLoad: Cross-Privilege-Boundary Data SamplingMichael Schwarz, Moritz Lipp, Daniel Moghimi, Jo Van Bulck 等CCS 2019 · 被引用 464 次
- RIDL: Rogue In-Flight Data LoadStephan van Schaik, Alyssa Milburn, Sebastian Österlund, Pietro Frigo 等S&P 2019 · 被引用 408 次
- Spectector: Principled Detection of Speculative Information FlowsMarco Guarnieri, Boris Köpf, José F. Morales, Jan Reineke 等S&P 2020 · 被引用 177 次
- Hardware-Software Contracts for Secure SpeculationMarco Guarnieri, Boris Köpf, Jan Reineke, Pepe VilaS&P 2021 · 被引用 111 次
相关 Paper
- Cats vs. Spectre: An Axiomatic Approach to Modeling Speculative Execution AttacksHernán Ponce de León, Johannes KinderS&P 2022 · 被引用 35 次
- Speculation at Fault: Modeling and Testing Microarchitectural Leakage of CPU ExceptionsJana Hofmann, Emanuele Vannacci, Cédric Fournet, Boris Köpf 等USENIX Security 2023
- InSpectre: Breaking and Fixing Microarchitectural Vulnerabilities by Formal AnalysisRoberto Guanciale, Musard Balliu, Mads DamCCS 2020 · 被引用 51 次
- Revizor: testing black-box CPUs against speculation contractsOleksii Oleksenko, Christof Fetzer, Boris Köpf, Mark SilbersteinASPLOS 2022 · 被引用 36 次
- ProSpeCT: Provably Secure Speculation for the Constant-Time PolicyLesly-Ann Daniel, Marton Bognar, Job Noorman, Sébastien Bardin 等USENIX Security 2023
