ProSpeCT: Provably Secure Speculation for the Constant-Time Policy
Lesly-Ann Daniel, Marton Bognar, Job Noorman, Sébastien Bardin, Tamara Rezk, Frank Piessens
摘要
We propose ProSpeCT, a generic formal processor model providing provably secure speculation for the constant-time policy. For constant-time programs under a non-speculative semantics, ProSpeCT guarantees that speculative and out-of-order execution cause no microarchitectural leaks. This guarantee is achieved by tracking secrets in the processor pipeline and ensuring that they do not influence the microarchitectural state during speculative execution. Our formalization covers a broad class of speculation mechanisms, generalizing prior work. As a result, our security proof covers all known Spectre attacks, including load value injection (LVI) attacks. In addition to the formal model, we provide a prototype hardware implementation of ProSpeCT on a RISC-V processor and show evidence of its low impact on hardware cost, performance, and required software changes. In particular, the experimental evaluation confirms our expectation that for a compliant constant-time binary, enabling ProSpeCT incurs no performance overhead.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper16
- SpecLFB: Eliminating Cache Side Channels in Speculative ExecutionsXiaoyu Cheng, Fei Tong, Hongyu Wang, Zhe Zhou 等USENIX Security 2024 · 被引用 7 次
- Architectural Mimicry: Innovative Instructions to Efficiently Address Control-Flow Leakage in Data-Oblivious ProgramsHans Winderix, Marton Bognar, Job Noorman, Lesly-Ann Daniel 等S&P 2024 · 被引用 5 次
- Towards Efficient Verification of Constant-Time Cryptographic ImplementationsLuwei Cai, Fu Song, Taolue ChenFSE 2024 · 被引用 4 次
- On Kernel's Safety in the Spectre Era (And KASLR is Formally Dead)Davide Davoli, Martin Avanzini, Tamara RezkCCS 2024 · 被引用 2 次
- Cassandra: Efficient Enforcement of Sequential Execution for Cryptographic ProgramsAli Hajiabadi, Trevor E. CarlsonISCA 2025 · 被引用 2 次
它引用的顶会 Paper38
- Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative ExecutionPaul Kocher, Jann Horn, Anders Fogh, Daniel Genkin 等S&P 2019 · 被引用 2,435 次
- Meltdown: Reading Kernel Memory from User SpaceMoritz Lipp, Michael Schwarz, Daniel Gruss, Thomas Prescher 等USENIX Security 2018 · 被引用 1,456 次
- Foreshadow: Extracting the Keys to the Intel SGX Kingdom with Transient Out-of-Order ExecutionJo Van Bulck, Marina Minkin, Ofir Weisse, Daniel Genkin 等USENIX Security 2018 · 被引用 1,175 次
- ret2spec: Speculative Execution Using Return Stack BuffersGiorgi Maisuradze, Christian RossowCCS 2018 · 被引用 282 次
- LVI: Hijacking Transient Execution through Microarchitectural Load Value InjectionJo Van Bulck, Daniel Moghimi, Michael Schwarz, Moritz Lipp 等S&P 2020 · 被引用 275 次
相关 Paper
- InSpectre: Breaking and Fixing Microarchitectural Vulnerabilities by Formal AnalysisRoberto Guanciale, Musard Balliu, Mads DamCCS 2020 · 被引用 51 次
- Constant-time foundations for the new spectre eraSunjay Cauligi, Craig Disselkoen, Klaus von Gleissenthall, Dean M. Tullsen 等PLDI 2020 · 被引用 90 次
- Levioso: Efficient Compiler-Informed Secure SpeculationAli Hajiabadi, Archit Agarwal, Andreas Diavastos, Trevor E. CarlsonDAC 2024 · 被引用 1 次
- Speculative interference attacks: breaking invisible speculation schemesMohammad Behnia, Prateek Sahu, Riccardo Paccagnella, Jiyong Yu 等ASPLOS 2021 · 被引用 69 次
- Spectre on RISC-V Silicon: Attacks and Defenses on Commercial Out-of-Order ProcessorsLukas Gerlach, Marton Bognar, Daniel Weber, Michael Schwarz 等USENIX Security 2026
