Contracting with a Learning Agent
Guru Guruganesh, Yoav Kolumbus, Jon Schneider, Inbal Talgam-Cohen, Emmanouil-Vasileios Vlatakis-Gkaragkounis, Joshua R. Wang, S. Matthew Weinberg
摘要
Many real-life contractual relations differ completely from the clean, static model at the heart of principal-agent theory. Typically, they involve repeated strategic interactions of the principal and agent, taking place under uncertainty and over time. While appealing in theory, players seldom use complex dynamic strategies in practice, often preferring to circumvent complexity and approach uncertainty through learning. We initiate the study of repeated contracts with a learning agent, focusing on agents who achieve no-regret outcomes. Optimizing against a no-regret agent is a known open problem in general games; we achieve an optimal solution to this problem for a canonical contract setting, in which the agent's choice among multiple actions leads to success/failure. The solution has a surprisingly simple structure: for some , initially offer the agent a linear contract with scalar , then switch to offering a linear contract with scalar . This switch causes the agent to ``free-fall'' through their action space and during this time provides the principal with non-zero reward at zero cost. Despite apparent exploitation of the agent, this dynamic contract can leave both players better off compared to the best static contract. Our results generalize beyond success/failure, to arbitrary non-linear contracts which the principal rescales dynamically. Finally, we quantify the dependence of our results on knowledge of the time horizon, and are the first to address this consideration in the study of strategizing against learning agents.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper9
- Maximizing utility in multi-agent environments by anticipating the behavior of other learnersAngelos Assos, Yuval Dagan, Constantinos DaskalakisNeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 16 次
- Is Knowledge Power? On the (Im)possibility of Learning from Strategic InteractionsNivasini Ananthakrishnan, Nika Haghtalab, Chara Podimata, Kunhe YangNeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 9 次
- Impact of Decentralized Learning on Player Utilities in Stackelberg GamesKate Donahue, Nicole Immorlica, Meena Jagadeesan, Brendan Lucier 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 9 次
- Learning to Mitigate Externalities: the Coase Theorem with Hindsight RationalityAntoine Scheid, Aymeric Capitaine, Etienne Boursier, Eric Moulines 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 7 次
- Emergent Risk Awareness in Rational Agents under Resource ConstraintsDaniel Jarne Ornia, Nicholas Bishop, Joel Dyer, Wei-Chen Lee 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 5 次
它引用的顶会 Paper16
- No-Regret Learning and Mixed Nash Equilibria: They Do Not MixEmmanouil V. Vlatakis-Gkaragkounis, Lampros Flokas, Thanasis Lianeas, Panayotis Mertikopoulos 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 100 次
- Strategic Classification in the DarkGanesh Ghalme, Vineet Nair, Itay Eilat, Inbal Talgam-Cohen 等ICML 2021 · 被引用 70 次
- Auctions between Regret-Minimizing AgentsYoav Kolumbus, Noam NisanWWW 2022 · 被引用 47 次
- How and Why to Manipulate Your Own Agent: On the Incentives of Users of Learning AgentsYoav Kolumbus, Noam NisanNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 28 次
- Is Learning in Games Good for the Learners?William Brown, Jon Schneider, Kiran VodrahalliNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 27 次
相关 Paper
- Learning Optimal Contracts: How to Exploit Small Action SpacesFrancesco Bacchiocchi, Matteo Castiglioni, Alberto Marchesi, Nicola GattiICLR 2024 · 被引用 21 次
- Generalized Principal-Agent Problem with a Learning AgentTao Lin, Yiling ChenICLR 2025
- Learning to Incentivize in Repeated Principal-Agent Problems with Adversarial Agent ArrivalsJunyan Liu, Arnab Maiti, Artin Tajdini, Kevin Jamieson 等ICML 2025
- Incentivized Learning in Principal-Agent Bandit GamesAntoine Scheid, Daniil Tiapkin, Etienne Boursier, Aymeric Capitaine 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 17 次
- Contract Design Under Approximate Best ResponsesFrancesco Bacchiocchi, Jiarui Gan, Matteo Castiglioni, Alberto Marchesi 等ICML 2025
