On (Random-order) Online Contention Resolution Schemes for the Matching Polytope of (Bipartite) Graphs
Calum MacRury, Will Ma, Nathaniel Grammel
摘要
We present new results for online contention resolution schemes for the matching polytope of graphs, in the random-order (RCRS) and adversarial (OCRS) arrival models. Our results include improved selectability guarantees (i.e., lower bounds), as well as new impossibility results (i.e., upper bounds). By well-known reductions to the prophet (secretary) matching problem, a c-selectable OCRS (RCRS) implies a c-competitive algorithm for adversarial (random order) edge arrivals. Similar reductions are also known for the query-commit matching problem. For the adversarial arrival model, we present a new analysis of the OCRS of Ezra et al. (EC, 2020). We show that this scheme is 0.344-selectable for general graphs and 0.349-selectable for bipartite graphs, improving on the previous 0.337 selectability result for this algorithm. We also show that the selectability of this scheme cannot be greater than 0.361 for general graphs and 0.382 for bipartite graphs. We further show that no OCRS can achieve a selectability greater than 0.4 for general graphs, and 0.433 for bipartite graphs. For random-order arrivals, we present two attenuation-based schemes which use new attenuation functions. Our first RCRS is 0.474-selectable for general graphs, and our second is 0.476-selectable for bipartite graphs. These results improve upon the recent 0.45 (and 0.456) selectability results for general graphs (respectively, bipartite graphs) due to Pollner et al. (EC, 2022). On general graphs, our 0.474-selectable RCRS provides the best known positive result even for offline contention resolution, and also for the correlation gap. We conclude by proving a fundamental upper bound of 0.5 on the selectability of RCRS, using bipartite graphs. * The full version of the paper can be accessed at https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.07520
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper5
- Improved Guarantees for Offline Stochastic Matching via new Ordered Contention Resolution SchemesBrian Brubach, Nathaniel Grammel, Will Ma, Aravind SrinivasanNeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 26 次
- Random-Order Contention Resolution via Continuous Induction: Tightness for Bipartite Matching under Vertex ArrivalsCalum MacRury, Will MaSTOC 2024 · 被引用 3 次
- Nearly Tight Sample Complexity for Matroid Online Contention ResolutionMoran Feldman, Ola Svensson, Rico ZenklusenSODA 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Fair Matroid SelectionKiarash Banihashem, MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi, Danny MittalNeurIPS 2025
- Optimal Rounding for Two-Stage Bipartite MatchingTristan Pollner, Amin Saberi, Anders WikumSODA 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper3
- Improved Guarantees for Offline Stochastic Matching via new Ordered Contention Resolution SchemesBrian Brubach, Nathaniel Grammel, Will Ma, Aravind SrinivasanNeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 26 次
- Tight Guarantees for Multi-unit Prophet Inequalities and Online Stochastic KnapsackJiashuo Jiang, Will Ma, Jiawei ZhangSODA 2022 · 被引用 20 次
- Random-Order Contention Resolution via Continuous Induction: Tightness for Bipartite Matching under Vertex ArrivalsCalum MacRury, Will MaSTOC 2024 · 被引用 3 次
相关 Paper
- Online Weighted Matching with a SampleHaim Kaplan, David Naori, Danny RazSODA 2022 · 被引用 14 次
- Simple and Optimal Greedy Online Contention Resolution SchemesVasilis LivanosNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 1 次
- Multiway Online Correlated SelectionGuy Blanc, Moses CharikarFOCS 2021 · 被引用 16 次
- Fully Dynamic Online Selection through Online Contention Resolution SchemesVashist Avadhanula, Andrea Celli, Riccardo Colini-Baldeschi, Stefano Leonardi 等AAAI 2023 · 被引用 1 次
- Online Selection Problems against Constrained AdversaryZhihao Jiang, Pinyan Lu, Zhihao Gavin Tang, Yuhao ZhangICML 2021 · 被引用 16 次
