Tight Guarantees for Multi-unit Prophet Inequalities and Online Stochastic Knapsack
Jiashuo Jiang, Will Ma, Jiawei Zhang
摘要
Prophet inequalities are a useful tool for designing online allocation procedures and comparing their performance to the optimal offline allocation. In the basic setting of k-unit prophet inequalities, the procedure of Alaei [2] with its celebrated performance guarantee of has found widespread adoption in mechanism design and general online allocation problems in online advertising, healthcare scheduling, and revenue management. Despite being commonly used for implementing a fractional allocation in an online fashion, the tightness of Alaei's procedure for a given k has remained unknown. In this paper we resolve this question, characterizing the tight bound by identifying the structure of the optimal online implementation, and consequently improving the best-known guarantee for k-unit prophet inequalities for all k > 1. We also consider the more general online stochastic knapsack problem where each individual allocation can consume an arbitrary fraction of the initial capacity. Here we introduce a new “best-fit” procedure for implementing a fractionally-feasible knapsack solution online, with a performance guarantee of ≈ 0.319, which we also show is tight with respect to the standard LP relaxation. This improves the previously best-known guarantee of 0.2 for online knapsack. Our analysis differs from existing ones by eschewing the need to split items into “large” or “small” based on capacity consumption, using instead an invariant for the overall utilization on different sample paths. All in all, our results imply tight (non-greedy) Online Contention Resolution Schemes for k-uniform matroids and the knapsack polytope, respectively, which has further implications.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper12
- On (Random-order) Online Contention Resolution Schemes for the Matching Polytope of (Bipartite) GraphsCalum MacRury, Will Ma, Nathaniel GrammelSODA 2023 · 被引用 8 次
- Beyond Regularity: Simple versus Optimal Mechanisms, RevisitedYiding Feng, Yaonan JinFOCS 2025 · 被引用 6 次
- Prophet Inequalities Require Only a Constant Number of SamplesAndrés Cristi, Bruno ZiliottoSTOC 2024 · 被引用 6 次
- Prophet Inequalities with Cancellation CostsFarbod Ekbatani, Rad Niazadeh, Pranav Nuti, Jan VondrákSTOC 2024 · 被引用 6 次
- Improved Regret and Contextual Linear Extension for Pandora's Box and Prophet InequalityJunyan Liu, Ziyun Chen, Kun Wang, Haipeng Luo 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 5 次
相关 Paper
- Prophet Inequalities: Competing with the Top ℓ Items is EasyMathieu Molina, Nicolas Gast, Patrick Loiseau, Vianney PerchetSODA 2025
- A Constant Factor Prophet Inequality for Online Combinatorial AuctionsJosé Correa, Andrés CristiSTOC 2023 · 被引用 18 次
- Simple and Optimal Greedy Online Contention Resolution SchemesVasilis LivanosNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 1 次
- Mechanism Design via the Interim RelaxationKshipra Bhawalkar, Marios Mertzanidis, Divyarthi Mohan, Alexandros PsomasNeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 2 次
- An O(log log m) Prophet Inequality for Subadditive Combinatorial AuctionsPaul Dütting, Thomas Kesselheim, Brendan LucierFOCS 2020 · 被引用 22 次
