Representation-Based Exploration for Language Models: From Test-Time to Post-Training
Jens Tuyls, Dylan J Foster, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Jordan T. Ash
摘要
Reinforcement learning (RL) promises to expand the capabilities of language models, but it is unclear if current RL techniques promote the discovery of novel behaviors, or simply sharpen those already present in the base model. In this paper, we investigate the value of deliberate exploration---explicitly incentivizing the model to discover novel and diverse behaviors---and aim to understand how the knowledge in pre-trained models can guide this search. Our main finding is that exploration with a simple, principled, representation-based bonus derived from the pre-trained language model's hidden states significantly improves diversity and pass@k rates---both for post-training, and in a novel inference-time scaling setting we introduce. (1) For inference-time, exploration with representation-based diversity improves efficiency, consistently improving pass@k rates across a variety of models and reasoning tasks. For example, for Qwen-2.5-14b-Instruct we obtain over 50% improvement in verifier efficiency on almost all considered tasks. (2) For post-training, we show that integrating this exploration strategy into an RL pipeline improves reasoning performance over that of the initial model and over standard RL post-training. For example, on AIME 2024, our post-trained Qwen-2.5-7b-Instruct's pass@80 matches the pass@256 of GRPO on the same model, demonstrating a 3x improvement in test-time sample efficiency. Overall, our findings suggest that deliberate exploration---with the right notion of diversity---is a practical path toward discovery of new behaviors beyond sharpening.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper2
- Maximum Likelihood Reinforcement LearningFahim Tajwar, Guanning Zeng, Yueer Zhou, Yuda Song 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 18 次
- Rubric Curriculum RL: Exploiting the Generation-Verification Gap in Non-Verifiable DomainsTejas Krishnan, Sumeet Motwani, Charles London, Suhaas Bhat 等ICML 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper31
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 10,924 次
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 5,068 次
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes 等ICLR 2020 · 被引用 4,112 次
- DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at ScaleQiying Yu, Zheng Zhang, Ruofei Zhu, Yufeng Yuan 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 2,828 次
- Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code GenerationJiawei Liu, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Yuyao Wang, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 2,317 次
相关 Paper
- TTRL: Test-Time Reinforcement LearningYuxin Zuo, Kaiyan Zhang, Li Sheng, Shang Qu 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 249 次
- RLP: Reinforcement as a Pretraining ObjectiveAli Hatamizadeh, Syeda Nahida Akter, Shrimai Prabhumoye, Jan Kautz 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 26 次
- MetaAct-RL: Training Language Models for Reasoning Through Meta-Action-Based Reinforcement LearningZhiheng Xi, Yuhui Wang, Yiwen Ding, Guanyu Li 等AAAI 2026
- Scaling Behaviors of LLM Reinforcement Learning Post-Training: An Empirical Study in Mathematical ReasoningZelin Tan, Hejia Geng, Xiaohang Yu, Mulei Zhang 等ACL 2026 · 被引用 17 次
- Incentivizing LLMs to Self-Verify Their AnswersFuxiang Zhang, Jiacheng Xu, Chaojie Wang, Ce Cui 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 20 次
