LazyTAP: On-Demand Data Minimization for Trigger-Action Applications
Mohammad M. Ahmadpanah, Daniel Hedin, Andrei Sabelfeld
摘要
Trigger-Action Platforms (TAPs) empower applications (apps) for connecting otherwise unconnected devices and services. The current TAPs like IFTTT require trigger services to push excessive amounts of sensitive data to the TAP regardless of whether the data will be used in the app, at odds with the principle of data minimization. Furthermore, the rich features of modern TAPs, including IFTTT queries to support multiple trigger services and nondeterminism of apps, have been out of the reach of previous data minimization approaches like minTAP. This paper proposes LazyTAP, a new paradigm for fine-grained on-demand data minimization. LazyTAP breaks away from the traditional push-all approach of coarse-grained data over-approximation. Instead, LazyTAP pulls input data on-demand, once it is accessed by the app execution. Thanks to the fine granularity, LazyTAP enables tight minimization that naturally generalizes to support multiple trigger services via queries and is robust with respect to nondeterministic behavior of the apps. We achieve seamlessness for third-party app developers by leveraging laziness to defer computation and proxy objects to load necessary remote data behind the scenes as it becomes needed. We formally establish the correctness of LazyTAP and its minimization properties with respect to both IFTTT and minTAP. We implement and evaluate LazyTAP on app benchmarks showing that on average LazyTAP improves minimization by 95% over IFTTT and by 38% over minTAP, while incurring a tolerable performance overhead.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper9
- Foreshadow: Extracting the Keys to the Intel SGX Kingdom with Transient Out-of-Order ExecutionJo Van Bulck, Marina Minkin, Ofir Weisse, Daniel Genkin 等USENIX Security 2018 · 被引用 1,175 次
- Plundervolt: Software-based Fault Injection Attacks against Intel SGXKit Murdock, David F. Oswald, Flavio D. Garcia, Jo Van Bulck 等S&P 2020 · 被引用 369 次
- Charting the Attack Surface of Trigger-Action IoT PlatformsQi Wang, Pubali Datta, Wei Yang, Si Liu 等CCS 2019 · 被引用 162 次
- If This Then What?: Controlling Flows in IoT AppsIulia Bastys, Musard Balliu, Andrei SabelfeldCCS 2018 · 被引用 119 次
- Scalable analysis of interaction threats in IoT systemsMohannad Alhanahnah, Clay Stevens, Hamid BagheriISSTA 2020 · 被引用 63 次
相关 Paper
- Practical Data Access Minimization in Trigger-Action PlatformsYunang Chen, Mohannad Alhanahnah, Andrei Sabelfeld, Rahul Chatterjee 等USENIX Security 2022
- Data Privacy in Trigger-Action SystemsYunang Chen, Amrita Roy Chowdhury, Ruizhe Wang, Andrei Sabelfeld 等S&P 2021 · 被引用 22 次
- SandTrap: Securing JavaScript-driven Trigger-Action PlatformsMohammad M. Ahmadpanah, Daniel Hedin, Musard Balliu, Lars Eric Olsson 等USENIX Security 2021 · 被引用 31 次
- Decentralized Action Integrity for Trigger-Action IoT PlatformsEarlence Fernandes, Amir Rahmati, Jaeyeon Jung, Atul PrakashNDSS 2018 · 被引用 14 次
- Architecting Trigger-Action Platforms for Security, Performance and FunctionalityDeepak Sirone Jegan, Michael M. Swift, Earlence FernandesNDSS 2024
