Data Privacy in Trigger-Action Systems
Yunang Chen, Amrita Roy Chowdhury, Ruizhe Wang, Andrei Sabelfeld, Rahul Chatterjee, Earlence Fernandes
摘要
Trigger-action platforms (TAPs) allow users to connect independent web-based or IoT services to achieve useful automation. They provide a simple interface that helps end-users create trigger-compute-action rules that pass data between disparate Internet services. Unfortunately, TAPs introduce a large-scale security risk: if they are compromised, attackers will gain access to sensitive data for millions of users. To avoid this risk, we propose eTAP, a privacy-enhancing trigger-action platform that executes trigger-compute-action rules without accessing users’ private data in plaintext or learning anything about the results of the computation. We use garbled circuits as a primitive, and leverage the unique structure of trigger-compute-action rules to make them practical. We formally state and prove the security guarantees of our protocols. We prototyped eTAP, which supports the most commonly used operations on popular commercial TAPs like IFTTT and Zapier. Specifically, it supports Boolean, arithmetic, and string operations on private trigger data and can run 100% of the top-500 rules of IFTTT users and 93.4% of all publicly-available rules on Zapier. Based on ten existing rules that exercise a wide variety of operations, we show that eTAP has a modest performance impact: on average rule execution latency increases by 70 ms (55%) and throughput reduces by 59%.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper5
- Practical Data Access Minimization in Trigger-Action PlatformsYunang Chen, Mohannad Alhanahnah, Andrei Sabelfeld, Rahul Chatterjee 等USENIX Security 2022
- Universal Cross-app Attacks: Exploiting and Securing OAuth 2.0 in Integration PlatformsKaixuan Luo, Xianbo Wang, Adonis P. H. Fung, Wing Cheong Lau 等USENIX Security 2025
- Conditional Encryption with Applications to Secure Personalized Password Typo CorrectionMohammad Hassan Ameri, Jeremiah BlockiCCS 2024
- Architecting Trigger-Action Platforms for Security, Performance and FunctionalityDeepak Sirone Jegan, Michael M. Swift, Earlence FernandesNDSS 2024
- LazyTAP: On-Demand Data Minimization for Trigger-Action ApplicationsMohammad M. Ahmadpanah, Daniel Hedin, Andrei SabelfeldS&P 2023
它引用的顶会 Paper7
- Foreshadow: Extracting the Keys to the Intel SGX Kingdom with Transient Out-of-Order ExecutionJo Van Bulck, Marina Minkin, Ofir Weisse, Daniel Genkin 等USENIX Security 2018 · 被引用 1,175 次
- Plundervolt: Software-based Fault Injection Attacks against Intel SGXKit Murdock, David F. Oswald, Flavio D. Garcia, Jo Van Bulck 等S&P 2020 · 被引用 369 次
- Charting the Attack Surface of Trigger-Action IoT PlatformsQi Wang, Pubali Datta, Wei Yang, Si Liu 等CCS 2019 · 被引用 162 次
- If This Then What?: Controlling Flows in IoT AppsIulia Bastys, Musard Balliu, Andrei SabelfeldCCS 2018 · 被引用 119 次
- Faster Malicious 2-Party Secure Computation with Online/Offline Dual ExecutionPeter Rindal, Mike RosulekUSENIX Security 2016 · 被引用 63 次
相关 Paper
- Decentralized Action Integrity for Trigger-Action IoT PlatformsEarlence Fernandes, Amir Rahmati, Jaeyeon Jung, Atul PrakashNDSS 2018 · 被引用 14 次
- SandTrap: Securing JavaScript-driven Trigger-Action PlatformsMohammad M. Ahmadpanah, Daniel Hedin, Musard Balliu, Lars Eric Olsson 等USENIX Security 2021 · 被引用 31 次
- Don't Bite Off More than You Can Chew: Investigating Excessive Permission Requests in Trigger-Action IntegrationsLiuhuo Wan, Kailong Wang, Kulani Mahadewa, Haoyu Wang 等WWW 2024 · 被引用 4 次
- Identifying privacy weaknesses from multi-party trigger-action integration platformsKulani Mahadewa, Yanjun Zhang, Guangdong Bai, Lei Bu 等ISSTA 2021 · 被引用 25 次
- TAPFixer: Automatic Detection and Repair of Home Automation Vulnerabilities based on Negated-property ReasoningYinbo Yu, Yuanqi Xu, Kepu Huang, Jiajia LiuUSENIX Security 2024 · 被引用 6 次
