ProphetFuzz: Fully Automated Prediction and Fuzzing of High-Risk Option Combinations with Only Documentation via Large Language Model
Dawei Wang, Geng Zhou, Li Chen, Dan Li, Yukai Miao
摘要
Vulnerabilities related to option combinations pose a significant challenge in software security testing due to their vast search space. Previous research primarily addressed this challenge through mutation or filtering techniques, which inefficiently treated all option combinations as having equal potential for vulnerabilities, thus wasting considerable time on non-vulnerable targets and resulting in low testing efficiency. In this paper, we utilize carefully designed prompt engineering to drive the large language model (LLM) to predict high-risk option combinations (i.e., more likely to contain vulnerabilities) and perform fuzz testing automatically without human intervention. We developed a tool called ProphetFuzz and evaluated it on a dataset comprising 52 programs collected from three related studies. The entire experiment consumed 10.44 CPU years. ProphetFuzz successfully predicted 1748 high-risk option combinations at an average cost of only 8.69 per program. Results show that after 72 hours of fuzzing, ProphetFuzz discovered 364 unique vulnerabilities associated with 12.30% of the predicted high-risk option combinations, which was 32.85% higher than that found by state-of-the-art in the same timeframe. Additionally, using ProphetFuzz, we conducted persistent fuzzing on the latest versions of these programs, uncovering 140 vulnerabilities, with 93 confirmed by developers and 21 awarded CVE numbers.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper8
- Chasing Shadows: Pitfalls in LLM Security ResearchJonathan Evertz, Niklas Risse, Nicolai Neuer, Andreas Müller 等NDSS 2026 · 被引用 17 次
- Unlocking Low Frequency Syscalls in Kernel Fuzzing with Dependency-Based RAGZhiyu Zhang, Longxing Li, Ruigang Liang, Kai ChenISSTA 2025 · 被引用 3 次
- PILOT: Command-Line Interface Fuzzing Via Path-Guided, Iterative Large Language Model PromptingMomoko Shiraishi, Yinzhi Cao, Takahiro ShinagawaS&P 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- MUTATO: Enhancing Fuzz Drivers with Adaptive API Option MutationShuangxiang Kan, Xiao Cheng, Yuekang LiNDSS 2026
- MMAligner: Safeguarding Multimodal Large Language Models through Representation CalibrationShenyi Zhang, Keyan Guo, Zihao Wang, Xuebin Li 等CCS 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper22
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 64,255 次
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Coverage-based Greybox Fuzzing as Markov ChainMarcel Böhme, Van-Thuan Pham, Abhik RoychoudhuryCCS 2016 · 被引用 1,026 次
- Large Language Models as OptimizersChengrun Yang, Xuezhi Wang, Yifeng Lu, Hanxiao Liu 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 817 次
- Evaluating Fuzz TestingGeorge Klees, Andrew Ruef, Benji Cooper, Shiyi Wei 等CCS 2018 · 被引用 753 次
相关 Paper
- CarpetFuzz: Automatic Program Option Constraint Extraction from Documentation for FuzzingDawei Wang, Ying Li, Zhiyu Zhang, Kai ChenUSENIX Security 2023
- Fuzzing FPGA Synthesis and Simulation Tools via LLM-Generated Syntax-Valid HDL CodesHe Jiang, Wen Zhao, Shikai Guo, Zhihao Xu 等ISSTA 2026
- PromFuzz: Leveraging LLM-Driven and Bug-Oriented Composite Analysis for Detecting Functional Bugs in Smart ContractsXingshuang Lin, Qinge Xie, Binbin Zhao, Yuan Tian 等ASE 2025 · 被引用 5 次
- HFuzzer: Testing Large Language Models for Package Hallucinations via Phrase-based FuzzingYukai Zhao, Menghan Wu, Xing Hu, Xin XiaASE 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- TRIGFUZZ: Triggering Conditions Guided Directed FuzzingYiyang Chen, Nuoqi Gui, Long Wang, Longfei Chen 等S&P 2026 · 被引用 1 次
