Learning to Faithfully Rationalize by Construction
Sarthak Jain, Sarah Wiegreffe, Yuval Pinter, Byron C. Wallace
摘要
In many settings it is important for one to be able to understand why a model made a particular prediction. In NLP this often entails extracting snippets of an input text 'responsible for' corresponding model output; when such a snippet comprises tokens that indeed informed the model's prediction, it is a faithful explanation. In some settings, faithfulness may be critical to ensure transparency. Lei et al. (2016) proposed a model to produce faithful rationales for neural text classification by defining independent snippet extraction and prediction modules. However, the discrete selection over input tokens performed by this method complicates training, leading to high variance and requiring careful hyperparameter tuning. We propose a simpler variant of this approach that provides faithful explanations by construction. In our scheme, named FRESH, arbitrary feature importance scores (e.g., gradients from a trained model) are used to induce binary labels over token inputs, which an extractor can be trained to predict. An independent classifier module is then trained exclusively on snippets provided by the extractor; these snippets thus constitute faithful explanations, even if the classifier is arbitrarily complex. In both automatic and manual evaluations we find that variants of this simple framework yield predictive performance superior to 'end-to-end' approaches, while being more general and easier to train. 1
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper52
- Do Feature Attribution Methods Correctly Attribute Features?Yilun Zhou, Serena Booth, Marco Túlio Ribeiro, Julie ShahAAAI 2022 · 被引用 167 次
- Explaining Black Box Predictions and Unveiling Data Artifacts through Influence FunctionsXiaochuang Han, Byron C. Wallace, Yulia TsvetkovACL 2020 · 被引用 91 次
- UNIREX: A Unified Learning Framework for Language Model Rationale ExtractionAaron Chan, Maziar Sanjabi, Lambert Mathias, Liang Tan 等ICML 2022 · 被引用 48 次
- SELFEXPLAIN: A Self-Explaining Architecture for Neural Text ClassifiersDheeraj Rajagopal, Vidhisha Balachandran, Eduard H. Hovy, Yulia TsvetkovEMNLP 2021 · 被引用 39 次
- ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP ModelsJay DeYoung, Sarthak Jain, Nazneen Fatema Rajani, Eric P. Lehman 等ACL 2020 · 被引用 36 次
它引用的顶会 Paper3
- On Identifiability in TransformersGino Brunner, Yang Liu, Damian Pascual, Oliver Richter 等ICLR 2020 · 被引用 210 次
- ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP ModelsJay DeYoung, Sarthak Jain, Nazneen Fatema Rajani, Eric P. Lehman 等ACL 2020 · 被引用 36 次
- Learning to Deceive with Attention-Based ExplanationsDanish Pruthi, Mansi Gupta, Bhuwan Dhingra, Graham Neubig 等ACL 2020 · 被引用 17 次
相关 Paper
- Flexible Instance-Specific Rationalization of NLP ModelsGeorge Chrysostomou, Nikolaos AletrasAAAI 2022 · 被引用 17 次
- Graph-Guided Textual Explanation Generation FrameworkShuzhou Yuan, Jingyi Sun, Ran Zhang, Michael Färber 等EMNLP 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- Knowledge-Grounded Self-Rationalization via Extractive and Natural Language ExplanationsBodhisattwa Prasad Majumder, Oana Camburu, Thomas Lukasiewicz, Julian J. McAuleyICML 2022 · 被引用 40 次
- "Will You Find These Shortcuts?" A Protocol for Evaluating the Faithfulness of Input Salience Methods for Text ClassificationJasmijn Bastings, Sebastian Ebert, Polina Zablotskaia, Anders Sandholm 等EMNLP 2022 · 被引用 29 次
- Zero-Shot Natural Language ExplanationsFawaz Sammani, Nikos DeligiannisICLR 2025
