UNIREX: A Unified Learning Framework for Language Model Rationale Extraction
Aaron Chan, Maziar Sanjabi, Lambert Mathias, Liang Tan, Shaoliang Nie, Xiaochang Peng, Xiang Ren, Hamed Firooz
摘要
An extractive rationale explains a language model’s (LM’s) prediction on a given task instance by highlighting the text inputs that most influenced the prediction. Ideally, rationale extraction should be faithful (reflective of LM’s actual behavior) and plausible (convincing to humans), without compromising the LM’s (i.e., task model’s) task performance. Although attribution algorithms and select-predict pipelines are commonly used in rationale extraction, they both rely on certain heuristics that hinder them from satisfying all three desiderata. In light of this, we propose UNIREX, a flexible learning framework which generalizes rationale extractor optimization as follows: (1) specify architecture for a learned rationale extractor; (2) select explainability objectives (i.e., faithfulness and plausibility criteria); and (3) jointly the train task model and rationale extractor on the task using selected objectives. UNIREX enables replacing prior works’ heuristic design choices with a generic learned rationale extractor in (1) and optimizing it for all three desiderata in (2)-(3). To facilitate comparison between methods w.r.t. multiple desiderata, we introduce the Normalized Relative Gain (NRG) metric. Across five English text classification datasets, our best UNIREX configuration outperforms the strongest baselines by an average of 32.9% NRG. Plus, we find that UNIREX-trained rationale extractors’ faithfulness can even generalize to unseen datasets and tasks.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper11
- D-Separation for Causal Self-ExplanationWei Liu, Jun Wang, Haozhao Wang, Ruixuan Li 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 29 次
- Towards Trustworthy Explanation: On Causal RationalizationWenbo Zhang, Tong Wu, Yunlong Wang, Yong Cai 等ICML 2023 · 被引用 25 次
- Tailoring Self-Rationalizers with Multi-Reward DistillationSahana Ramnath, Brihi Joshi, Skyler Hallinan, Ximing Lu 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 23 次
- PINTO: Faithful Language Reasoning Using Prompt-Generated RationalesPeifeng Wang, Aaron Chan, Filip Ilievski, Muhao Chen 等ICLR 2023 · 被引用 21 次
- Is the MMI Criterion Necessary for Interpretability? Degenerating Non-causal Features to Plain Noise for Self-RationalizationWei Liu, Zhiying Deng, Zhongyu Niu, Jun Wang 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 17 次
它引用的顶会 Paper9
- Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior?Peter Hase, Mohit BansalACL 2020 · 被引用 216 次
- Improving Deep Learning Interpretability by Saliency Guided TrainingAya Abdelsalam Ismail, Héctor Corrada Bravo, Soheil FeiziNeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 121 次
- Evaluating and Characterizing Human RationalesSamuel Carton, Anirudh Rathore, Chenhao TanEMNLP 2020 · 被引用 38 次
- Discretized Integrated Gradients for Explaining Language ModelsSoumya Sanyal, Xiang RenEMNLP 2021 · 被引用 34 次
- NILE : Natural Language Inference with Faithful Natural Language ExplanationsSawan Kumar, Partha P. TalukdarACL 2020 · 被引用 15 次
相关 Paper
- Knowledge-Grounded Self-Rationalization via Extractive and Natural Language ExplanationsBodhisattwa Prasad Majumder, Oana Camburu, Thomas Lukasiewicz, Julian J. McAuleyICML 2022 · 被引用 40 次
- LIREx: Augmenting Language Inference with Relevant ExplanationsXinyan Zhao, V. G. Vinod VydiswaranAAAI 2021 · 被引用 41 次
- Measuring Association Between Labels and Free-Text RationalesSarah Wiegreffe, Ana Marasovic, Noah A. SmithEMNLP 2021 · 被引用 12 次
- QUASER: Question Answering with Scalable Extractive RationalizationAsish Ghoshal, Srinivasan Iyer, Bhargavi Paranjape, Kushal Lakhotia 等SIGIR 2022 · 被引用 2 次
- Making a (Counterfactual) Difference One Rationale at a TimeMitchell Plyler, Michael Green, Min ChiNeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 12 次
