Optimizing Canaries for Privacy Auditing with Metagradient Descent
Matteo Boglioni, Terrance Liu, Andrew Ilyas, Steven Wu
摘要
In this work we study black-box privacy auditing, where the goal is to lower bound the privacy parameter of a differentially private learning algorithm using only the algorithm’s outputs (i.e., final trained model). For DP-SGD (the most successful method for training differentially private deep learning models), the canonical auditing approach uses membership inference—an auditor comes with a small set of special “canary” examples, inserts a random subset of them into the training set, and then tries to discern which of their canaries were included in the training set (typically via a membership inference attack). The auditor’s success rate then provides a lower bound on the privacy parameters of the learning algorithm. Our main contribution is a method for optimizing the auditor’s canary set to improve privacy auditing, leveraging recent work on metagradient optimization (Engstrom et al., 2025). Our empirical evaluation demonstrates that in certain instances, using such optimized canaries can improve empirical lower bounds for differentially private image classification models by several times when compared to canaries proposed in prior work. Furthermore, we demonstrate that our method is DP-SGD agnostic and efficient: canaries optimized for non-private SGD with a small model architecture remain effective when auditing larger models trained with DP-SGD.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper2
- OptiFluence: Principled Design of Privacy CanariesMohammad Yaghini, Michael Aerni, Junrui Zhang, Nicolas Papernot 等ICML 2026
- Beyond Membership: Limitations of Add/Remove Adjacency in Differential PrivacyGauri Pradhan, Joonas Jälkö, Santiago Zanella-Béguelin, Antti HonkelaICLR 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper19
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan 等CCS 2016 · 被引用 7,620 次
- Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning: How Private is Private SGD?Matthew Jagielski, Jonathan R. Ullman, Alina OpreaNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 354 次
- Adversary Instantiation: Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Machine LearningMilad Nasr, Shuang Song, Abhradeep Thakurta, Nicolas Papernot 等S&P 2021 · 被引用 288 次
- Stabilizing Differentiable Architecture Search via Perturbation-based RegularizationXiangning Chen, Cho-Jui HsiehICML 2020 · 被引用 235 次
- If Influence Functions are the Answer, Then What is the Question?Juhan Bae, Nathan Ng, Alston Lo, Marzyeh Ghassemi 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 185 次
相关 Paper
- Nearly Tight Black-Box Auditing of Differentially Private Machine LearningMeenatchi Sundaram Muthu Selva Annamalai, Emiliano De CristofaroNeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 32 次
- Tight Auditing of Differentially Private Machine LearningMilad Nasr, Jamie Hayes, Thomas Steinke, Borja Balle 等USENIX Security 2023
- Privacy Auditing of Large Language ModelsAshwinee Panda, Xinyu Tang, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Milad Nasr 等ICLR 2025
- Bounding training data reconstruction in DP-SGDJamie Hayes, Borja Balle, Saeed MahloujifarNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 73 次
- Efficient Privacy Auditing for Generative Model via Local InformationJingnan Xu, Leixia Wang, Xiaofeng MengKDD 2026
