Lune

NeurIPS2020顶会

Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning: How Private is Private SGD?

Matthew Jagielski, Jonathan R. Ullman, Alina Oprea

2020年份
354被引次数
105顶会引用

摘要

We investigate whether Differentially Private SGD offers better privacy in practice than what is guaranteed by its state-of-the-art analysis. We do so via novel data poisoning attacks, which we show correspond to realistic privacy attacks. While previous work (Ma et al., arXiv 2019) proposed this connection between differential privacy and data poisoning as a defense against data poisoning, our use as a tool for understanding the privacy of a specific mechanism is new. More generally, our work takes a quantitative, empirical approach to understanding the privacy afforded by specific implementations of differentially private algorithms that we believe has the potential to complement and influence analytical work on differential privacy. An open-source implementation of our algorithms can be found at https://github.com/jagielski/auditing-dpsgd .

问问这篇 Paper

智能体会读完全文。

Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。

可以从这些问题问起

智能体调用

Luneget_paper_fulltext

在 Lune 里问

免费开始,无需绑卡

引用它的顶会 Paper105

问问它们各自怎么用它

它引用的顶会 Paper5

相关 Paper

黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖