Loaded Dice: Solving the Non-Selection Problem for Scalable Probabilistic RowHammer Defense
Jeonghyun Woo, Junsu Kim, Aamer Jaleel, Prashant J. Nair
摘要
DRAM scaling has exacerbated the RowHammer vulnerability. To counter this, JEDEC recently introduced Per Row Activation Counting (PRAC) with the Alert Back-Off protocol as an optional DDR5 feature. While promising, PRAC requires per-row counter cells that incur area overhead, and updating them on every activation lengthens DRAM timing parameters, degrading performance. Probabilistic mitigations such as MINT offer a lower-cost alternative by randomly selecting and mitigating rows within periodic mitigation windows. MINT is effective at higher thresholds , but at lower thresholds, it must raise its mitigation rate to overcome the nonselection problem, where heavily hammered rows can repeatedly escape sampling. This fixed-rate scaling reduces effective memory bandwidth even when no attack is present. To overcome this limitation, we propose PrISM, an intersection-based probabilistic mitigation that correlates sampled rows across windows using a Sampled History Queue (SHQ). PrISM samples a few activation slots per window, stores sampledbut-unmitigated rows in the SHQ, and requests an additional mitigation through the existing Alert Back-Off protocol when a sampled row reappears in this history. This allows PrISM to increase mitigation only when persistent row activity is observed, without globally increasing the fixed mitigation rate. At the threshold of 500, PrISM incurs a negligible 0.2% average slowdown compared to 14% for PRAC, with no DRAM array changes or per-row counters and only 625B of SRAM per bank, one to two orders of magnitude less than prior secure counter-based in-DRAM defenses. Compared to MINT, PrISM provides better scalability at low thresholds, reducing average slowdown from 10.7% to 1.5% at a threshold of 250, a 7.1× reduction. PrISM is open-sourced at https://github.com/STAR-Laboratory/prism.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper64
- Drammer: Deterministic Rowhammer Attacks on Mobile PlatformsVictor van der Veen, Yanick Fratantonio, Martina Lindorfer, Daniel Gruss 等CCS 2016 · 被引用 381 次
- Flip Feng Shui: Hammering a Needle in the Software StackKaveh Razavi, Ben Gras, Erik Bosman, Bart Preneel 等USENIX Security 2016 · 被引用 306 次
- Another Flip in the Wall of Rowhammer DefensesDaniel Gruss, Moritz Lipp, Michael Schwarz, Daniel Genkin 等S&P 2018 · 被引用 288 次
- TRRespass: Exploiting the Many Sides of Target Row RefreshPietro Frigo, Emanuele Vannacci, Hasan Hassan, Victor van der Veen 等S&P 2020 · 被引用 274 次
- Terminal Brain Damage: Exposing the Graceless Degradation in Deep Neural Networks Under Hardware Fault AttacksSanghyun Hong, Pietro Frigo, Yigitcan Kaya, Cristiano Giuffrida 等USENIX Security 2019 · 被引用 255 次
相关 Paper
- QPRAC: Towards Secure and Practical PRAC-based Rowhammer Mitigation using Priority QueuesJeonghyun Woo, Shaopeng Chris Lin, Prashant J. Nair, Aamer Jaleel 等HPCA 2025 · 被引用 20 次
- MIRZA: Efficiently Mitigating Rowhammer with Randomization and ALERTHritvik Taneja, Ali Hajiabadi, Michele Marazzi, Kaveh Razavi 等HPCA 2026 · 被引用 6 次
- MoPAC: Efficiently Mitigating Rowhammer with Probabilistic Activation CountingSuhas Vittal, Salman Qazi, Poulami Das, Moinuddin QureshiISCA 2025 · 被引用 13 次
- When Mitigations Backfire: Timing Channel Attacks and Defense for PRAC-Based RowHammer MitigationsJeonghyun Woo, Joyce Qu, Gururaj Saileshwar, Prashant Jayaprakash NairISCA 2025 · 被引用 6 次
- Chronus: Understanding and Securing the Cutting-Edge Industry Solutions to DRAM Read DisturbanceOguzhan Canpolat, A. Giray Yaglikçi, Geraldo F. Oliveira, Ataberk Olgun 等HPCA 2025 · 被引用 23 次
