Efficient Calibration for Decision Making
Parikshit Gopalan, Konstantinos Stavropoulos, Kunal Talwar, Pranay Tankala
摘要
A decision-theoretic characterization of perfect calibration is that an agent seeking to minimize a proper loss in expectation cannot improve their outcome by post-processing a perfectly calibrated predictor. Hu and Wu (FOCS'24) use this to define an approximate calibration measure called calibration decision loss (CDL), which measures the maximal improvement achievable by any post-processing over any proper loss. Unfortunately, CDL turns out to be intractable to even weakly approximate in the offline setting, given black-box access to the predictions and labels.
We suggest circumventing this by restricting attention to structured families of post-processing functions K. We define the calibration decision loss relative to K, denoted CDL K where we consider all proper losses but restrict post-processings to a structured family K. We develop a comprehensive theory of when CDL K is information-theoretically and computationally tractable:
• Complexity characterization. The sample complexity of estimating CDL K is determined by the VC dimension of thr(K), the concept class consisting of thresholds applied to any κ ∈ K. Computationally, estimating CDL K reduces to agnostically learning thr(K). This implies that estimating CDL relative to 1-Lipschitz post-processings is informationtheoretically hard.
• Quantitative characterization. Augmenting thr(K) with indicators of intervals of the form [0, a] yields a family of weight functions K ′ such that CDL K is characterized, up to a quadratic factor, by the weighted calibration error restricted to K ′ . This significantly generalizes prior bounds that were for specific choices of K.
• Omniprediction. If thr(K) is efficiently learnable there exists a single post-processing that performs competitively with the best post-processing in K for every proper loss. Classical recalibration algorithms including the Pool Adjacent Violators (PAV) algorithm and Uniform-mass binning give similar omniprediction guarantees for natural classes of post-processings with monotonic structure.
In addition to introducing new definitions and algorithmic techniques to the theory of calibration for decision making, our results give rigorous guarantees for some widely used recalibration procedures in machine learning.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper10
- Calibrating Predictions to Decisions: A Novel Approach to Multi-Class CalibrationShengjia Zhao, Michael P. Kim, Roshni Sahoo, Tengyu Ma 等NeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 96 次
- Smooth ECE: Principled Reliability Diagrams via Kernel SmoothingJaroslaw Blasiok, Preetum NakkiranICLR 2024 · 被引用 59 次
- Distribution-Free Calibration Guarantees for Histogram Binning without Sample SplittingChirag Gupta, Aaditya RamdasICML 2021 · 被引用 51 次
- When Does Optimizing a Proper Loss Yield Calibration?Jaroslaw Blasiok, Parikshit Gopalan, Lunjia Hu, Preetum NakkiranNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 48 次
- Near-Optimal Algorithms for OmnipredictionPrincewill Okoroafor, Robert Kleinberg, Michael P. KimFOCS 2025 · 被引用 37 次
相关 Paper
- Predict to Minimize Swap Regret for All Payoff-Bounded TasksLunjia Hu, Yifan WuFOCS 2024 · 被引用 1 次
- Dimension-Free Decision Calibration for Nonlinear Loss FunctionsJingwu Tang, Jiayun Wu, Steven Z. Wu, Jiahao ZhangICLR 2026 · 被引用 4 次
- Reliable Decisions with Threshold CalibrationRoshni Sahoo, Shengjia Zhao, Alyssa Chen, Stefano ErmonNeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 35 次
- Testing Calibration in Nearly-Linear TimeLunjia Hu, Arun Jambulapati, Kevin Tian, Chutong YangNeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 11 次
- Omnipredictors for Constrained OptimizationLunjia Hu, Inbal Rachel Livni Navon, Omer Reingold, Chutong YangICML 2023 · 被引用 17 次
