Dimension-Free Decision Calibration for Nonlinear Loss Functions
Jingwu Tang, Jiayun Wu, Steven Z. Wu, Jiahao Zhang
摘要
When model predictions inform downstream decision making, a natural question is under what conditions can the decision-makers simply respond to the predictions as if they were the true outcomes. Calibration-a classical statistical notion that requires the predictions to be unbiased conditional on the prediction values-suffices to guarantee that simple best-response to predictions is optimal. However, for high-dimensional prediction outcome spaces, obtaining an accurate calibrated predictor requires exponential computational and statistical complexity. The recent relaxation known as decision calibration [Zhao et al., 2021] circumvents this curse of dimensionality, as it only requires predictions to be unbiased conditional on the induced best-response actions-in effect ensuring the optimality of the simple best-response rule while requiring only polynomial sample complexity in the dimension of outcomes. However, known results on calibration and decision calibration crucially rely on linear loss functions for establishing best-response optimality. A natural approach to handle nonlinear losses is to map outcomes y into a feature space φ(y) of dimension m, then approximate losses with linear functions of φ(y). Unfortunately, even simple classes of nonlinear functions can demand exponentially large or infinite (e.g., RKHS-induced) feature dimensions m. A key open problem is whether it is possible to achieve decision calibration with sample complexity independent of m. We begin with a negative result: even verifying decision calibration under standard deterministic best response inherently requires sample complexity polynomial in m. Motivated by this lower bound, we investigate a smooth version of decision calibration in which decision-makers follow a smooth best-response-also known as the quantal response. This smooth relaxation enables dimension-free decision calibration algorithms. We introduce algorithms that, given poly(|A|, 1/ǫ) samples and any initial predictor p, can efficiently (1) determine if a predictor is decisioncalibrated, and (2) post-process the initial predictor to satisfy decision calibration without worsening accuracy. Our algorithms apply broadly to function classes that can be well-approximated by boundednorm functions in (possibly infinite-dimensional) separable RKHS; examples of such classes include piecewise linear loss functions and d-dimensional Cobb-Douglas loss functions.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper10
- Calibrating Predictions to Decisions: A Novel Approach to Multi-Class CalibrationShengjia Zhao, Michael P. Kim, Roshni Sahoo, Tengyu Ma 等NeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 96 次
- Near-Optimal Algorithms for OmnipredictionPrincewill Okoroafor, Robert Kleinberg, Michael P. KimFOCS 2025 · 被引用 37 次
- Calibrated Stackelberg Games: Learning Optimal Commitments Against Calibrated AgentsNika Haghtalab, Chara Podimata, Kunhe YangNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 34 次
- Outcome indistinguishabilityCynthia Dwork, Michael P. Kim, Omer Reingold, Guy N. Rothblum 等STOC 2021 · 被引用 24 次
- Optimal Multiclass U-Calibration Error and BeyondHaipeng Luo, Spandan Senapati, Vatsal SharanNeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 15 次
相关 Paper
- Efficient Calibration for Decision MakingParikshit Gopalan, Konstantinos Stavropoulos, Kunal Talwar, Pranay TankalaSTOC 2026 · 被引用 3 次
- Predict to Minimize Swap Regret for All Payoff-Bounded TasksLunjia Hu, Yifan WuFOCS 2024 · 被引用 1 次
- Robust Decision-Making with Partially Calibrated ForecastersShayan Kiyani, Hamed Hassani, George J. Pappas, Aaron RothICLR 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Reconciling Model Multiplicity for Downstream Decision MakingAlly Yalei Du, Dung Daniel T. Ngo, Zhiwei Steven WuICLR 2025
- Testing Calibration in Nearly-Linear TimeLunjia Hu, Arun Jambulapati, Kevin Tian, Chutong YangNeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 11 次
