Large Language Model Powered Symbolic Execution
Yihe Li, Ruijie Meng, Gregory J. Duck
摘要
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a promising alternative to traditional static program analysis methods, such as symbolic execution, offering the ability to reason over code directly without relying on theorem provers or SMT solvers. However, LLMs are also inherently approximate by nature, and therefore face significant challenges in relation to the accuracy and scale of analysis in real-world applications. Such issues often necessitate the use of larger LLMs with higher token limits, but this requires enterprise-grade hardware (GPUs) and thus limits accessibility for many users. In this paper, we propose LLM-based symbolic execution-a novel approach that enhances LLM inference via a path-based decomposition of the program analysis tasks into smaller (more tractable) subtasks. The core idea is to generalize path constraints using a generic code-based representation that the LLM can directly reason over, and without translation into another (less-expressive) formal language. We implement our approach in the form of AutoBug, an LLM-based symbolic execution engine that is lightweight and language-agnostic, making it a practical tool for analyzing code that is challenging for traditional approaches. We show that AutoBug can improve both the accuracy and scale of LLM-based program analysis, especially for smaller LLMs that can run on consumer-grade hardware.
• Computing methodologies → Knowledge representation and reasoning.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper3
- Cottontail: Large Language Model-Driven Concolic Execution for Highly Structured Test Input GenerationHaoxin Tu, Seongmin Lee, Yuxian Li, Peng Chen 等S&P 2026 · 被引用 22 次
- Defusing Logic Bombs in Symbolic Execution with LLM-Generated Ghost CodeDimitrios Stamatios Bouras, Sergey MechtaevISSTA 2026
- PBFuzz: Agentic Directed Fuzzing for PoV GenerationHaochen Zeng, Andrew Bao, Jiajun Cheng, Chengyu SongCCS 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper9
- SOK: (State of) The Art of War: Offensive Techniques in Binary AnalysisYan Shoshitaishvili, Ruoyu Wang, Christopher Salls, Nick Stephens 等S&P 2016 · 被引用 1,085 次
- Automated Program Repair in the Era of Large Pre-trained Language ModelsChunqiu Steven Xia, Yuxiang Wei, Lingming ZhangICSE 2023 · 被引用 321 次
- Automated Repair of Programs from Large Language ModelsZhiyu Fan, Xiang Gao, Martin Mirchev, Abhik Roychoudhury 等ICSE 2023 · 被引用 213 次
- Large Language Models for Code Analysis: Do LLMs Really Do Their Job?Chongzhou Fang, Ning Miao, Shaurya Srivastav, Jialin Liu 等USENIX Security 2024 · 被引用 110 次
- Same Task, More Tokens: the Impact of Input Length on the Reasoning Performance of Large Language ModelsMosh Levy, Alon Jacoby, Yoav GoldbergACL 2024 · 被引用 77 次
相关 Paper
- NESA: Relational Neuro-Symbolic Static Program AnalysisChengpeng Wang, Yifei Gao, Wuqi Zhang, Xuwei Liu 等FSE 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- NL-Debugging: Exploiting Natural Language as an Intermediate Representation for Code DebuggingWeiming Zhang, Qingyao Li, Xinyi Dai, Jizheng Chen 等EMNLP 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- Large Language Models Are Neurosymbolic ReasonersMeng Fang, Shilong Deng, Yudi Zhang, Zijing Shi 等AAAI 2024 · 被引用 53 次
- Agentic Concolic ExecutionZhengxiong Luo, Huan Zhao, Dylan Wolff, Cristian Cadar 等S&P 2026 · 被引用 17 次
- LLM Assistance for Memory SafetyJ. Nausheen Mohammed, Akash Lal, Aseem Rastogi, Rahul Sharma 等ICSE 2025 · 被引用 4 次
