PBFuzz: Agentic Directed Fuzzing for PoV Generation
Haochen Zeng, Andrew Bao, Jiajun Cheng, Chengyu Song
摘要
Proof-of-Vulnerability (PoV) input generation is a critical task in software security and supports downstream applications such as path generation and validation. Generating a PoV input requires solving two sets of constraints: (1) reachability constraints for reaching vulnerable code locations, and (2) triggering constraints for activating the target vulnerability. Existing approaches, including directed greybox fuzzing and LLM-assisted fuzzing, struggle to efficiently satisfy these constraints. This work presents an agentic method that mimics human experts. Human analysts iteratively study code to extract semantic reachability and triggering constraints, form hypotheses about PoV triggering strategies, encode them as test inputs, and refine their understanding using debugging feedback. We automate this process with an agentic directed fuzzing framework called PBFuzz. PBFuzz tackles four challenges in agentic PoV generation: autonomous code reasoning for semantic constraint extraction, custom program-analysis tools for targeted inference, persistent memory to avoid hypothesis drift, and property-based testing for efficient constraint solving while preserving input structure. Experiments on the Magma benchmark show strong results. PBFuzz triggered 57 vulnerabilities, surpassing all baselines, and uniquely triggered 17 vulnerabilities not exposed by existing fuzzers. PBFuzz achieved this within a 30-minute budget per target, while conventional approaches use 24 hours. Median time-to-exposure was 339 seconds for PBFuzz versus 8680 seconds for AFL++ with CmpLog, giving a 25.6× efficiency improvement with an API cost of $1.83 per vulnerability. In real-world application, PBFuzz reproduced three FFmpeg 1-day CVEs that had no public PoVs. CCS Concepts • Security and privacy → Software security engineering; Vulnerability scanners; • Software and its engineering → Software testing and debugging; • Theory of computation → Program analysis.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper31
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 5,828 次
- Hawkeye: Towards a Desired Directed Grey-box FuzzerHongxu Chen, Yinxing Xue, Yuekang Li, Bihuan Chen 等CCS 2018 · 被引用 335 次
- Large Language Models Are Zero-Shot Fuzzers: Fuzzing Deep-Learning Libraries via Large Language ModelsYinlin Deng, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Haoran Peng, Chenyuan Yang 等ISSTA 2023 · 被引用 253 次
- Fuzz4All: Universal Fuzzing with Large Language ModelsChunqiu Steven Xia, Matteo Paltenghi, Jia Le Tian, Michael Pradel 等ICSE 2024 · 被引用 155 次
- UNIFUZZ: A Holistic and Pragmatic Metrics-Driven Platform for Evaluating FuzzersYuwei Li, Shouling Ji, Yuan Chen, Sizhuang Liang 等USENIX Security 2021 · 被引用 142 次
相关 Paper
- PAGENT: Program Analysis Guided LLM Agent for Proof-of-Concept GenerationAchintya Desai, Md Shafiuzzaman, Wenbo Guo, Tevfik BultanISSTA 2026
- It Takes Two: Option-Aware Directed Greybox Fuzzing for Vulnerability PoC GenerationSusheng Wu, Xin Hu, Yiheng Cao, Zhuotong Zhou 等FSE 2026
- Make Agent Defeat Agent: Automatic Detection of Taint-Style Vulnerabilities in LLM-based AgentsFengyu Liu, Yuan Zhang, Jiaqi Luo, Jiarun Dai 等USENIX Security 2025
- Predecessor-aware Directed Greybox FuzzingYujian Zhang, Yaokun Liu, Jinyu Xu, Yanhao WangS&P 2024 · 被引用 8 次
- TRIGFUZZ: Triggering Conditions Guided Directed FuzzingYiyang Chen, Nuoqi Gui, Long Wang, Longfei Chen 等S&P 2026 · 被引用 1 次
