Security of Alerting Authorities in the WWW: Measuring Namespaces, DNSSEC, and Web PKI
Pouyan Fotouhi Tehrani, Eric Osterweil, Jochen H. Schiller, Thomas C. Schmidt, Matthias Wählisch
摘要
During disasters, crisis, and emergencies the public relies on online services provided by official authorities to receive timely alerts, trustworthy information, and access to relief programs. It is therefore crucial for the authorities to reduce risks when accessing their online services. This includes catering to secure identification of service, secure resolution of name to network service, and content security and privacy as a minimum base for trustworthy communication. In this paper, we take a first look at Alerting Authorities (AA) in the US and investigate security measures related to trustworthy and secure communication. We study the domain namespace structure, DNSSEC penetration, and web certificates. We introduce an integrative threat model to better understand whether and how the online presence and services of AAs are harmed. As an illustrative example, we investigate 1,388 Alerting Authorities. We observe partial heightened security relative to the global Internet trends, yet find cause for concern as about 78% of service providers fail to deploy measures of trustworthy service provision. Our analysis shows two major shortcomings. First, how the DNS ecosystem is leveraged: about 50% of organizations do not own their dedicated domain names and are dependent on others, 55% opt for unrestricted-use namespaces, which simplifies phishing, and less than 4% of unique AA domain names are secured by DNSSEC, which can lead to DNS poisoning and possibly to certificate misissuance. Second, how Web PKI certificates are utilized: 15% of all hosts provide none or invalid certificates, thus cannot cater to confidentiality and data integrity, 64% of the hosts provide domain validation certification that lack any identity information, and shared certificates have gained on popularity, which leads to fate-sharing and can be a cause for instability.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper6
- Hiding in Plain Sight: A Longitudinal Study of Combosquatting AbusePanagiotis Kintis, Najmeh Miramirkhani, Charles Lever, Yizheng Chen 等CCS 2017 · 被引用 166 次
- Let's Encrypt: An Automated Certificate Authority to Encrypt the Entire WebJosh Aas, Richard Barnes, Benton Case, Zakir Durumeric 等CCS 2019 · 被引用 138 次
- A Longitudinal, End-to-End View of the DNSSEC EcosystemTaejoong Chung, Roland van Rijswijk-Deij, Balakrishnan Chandrasekaran, David R. Choffnes 等USENIX Security 2017 · 被引用 125 次
- "I Have No Idea What I'm Doing" - On the Usability of Deploying HTTPSKatharina Krombholz, Wilfried Mayer, Martin Schmiedecker, Edgar R. WeipplUSENIX Security 2017 · 被引用 114 次
- Domain Validation++ For MitM-Resilient PKIMarkus Brandt, Tianxiang Dai, Amit Klein, Haya Schulmann 等CCS 2018 · 被引用 71 次
相关 Paper
- Measurement and Analysis of Private Key Sharing in the HTTPS EcosystemFrank Cangialosi, Taejoong Chung, David R. Choffnes, Dave Levin 等CCS 2016 · 被引用 89 次
- All Your DNS Records Point to Us: Understanding the Security Threats of Dangling DNS RecordsDaiping Liu, Shuai Hao, Haining WangCCS 2016 · 被引用 91 次
- Cloud Strife: Mitigating the Security Risks of Domain-Validated CertificatesKevin Borgolte, Tobias Fiebig, Shuang Hao, Christopher Kruegel 等NDSS 2018 · 被引用 63 次
- Under the Hood of DANE Mismanagement in SMTPHyeonmin Lee, Md. Ishtiaq Ashiq, Moritz Müller, Roland van Rijswijk-Deij 等USENIX Security 2022
- Cross the Zone: Toward a Covert Domain Hijacking via Shared DNS InfrastructureYunyi Zhang, Mingming Zhang, Baojun Liu, Zhan Liu 等USENIX Security 2024 · 被引用 3 次
