PiMRef: Deducing Ever-evolving Spear-phishing Emails with Knowledge Base Invariants
Ruofan Liu, Yun Lin, Yuxin Wang, Xiwen Teoh, Zhenkai Liang, Gongshen Liu, Haojin Zhu, Jin Song Dong
摘要
Phishing email is a critical step in the cybercrime kill chain due to the high reachability of victims' email accounts and the low cost of launching phishing campaigns. The proportion of AI-generated phishing emails peaked at 82.6% in 2025, and showed a higher click-through rate than manually written ones. This ever-evolving nature of phishing emails makes traditional rule-based and featureengineering-based phishing email detectors fight an uphill battle in the cat-and-mouse game of defense and attack.
In this work, we show that, large language models (LLMs) can be effectively exploited to generate profile-grounded spear-phishing, compromising major paradigms of phishing email detectors. To defend against such LLM-based spear-phishing attacks, we propose PiMRef, the first reference-based solution to detect ever-evolving phishing emails using knowledge-based invariants, targeting the identity-impersonation attacks that characterize spear-phishing. Our rationale lies in the fact that convincing phishing emails often include "disprovable claims", which contradict certain real-world facts. Therefore, we reduce the problem of phishing email detection to an identity fact-checking problem on the sender's identity within the email context, enabling defenses against evolving phishing threats with high accuracy and explainability. Technically, given an email, PiMRef (i) discovers the claimed identity of the sender, (ii) verifies the sender's email domain against a dynamically expandable knowledge base, and (iii) infers call-to-action instructions that encourage next-step engagement. The detected contradictory identity facts serve as both alarms and explanations.
Compared to existing baselines such as D-Fence, HelpHed, and ChatSpamDetector, PiMRef reduces the false-positive rate to 0.81%
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper23
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu 等ICLR 2022 · 被引用 18,833 次
- Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and EntailmentDi Jin, Zhijing Jin, Joey Tianyi Zhou, Peter SzolovitsAAAI 2020 · 被引用 1,333 次
- Phishpedia: A Hybrid Deep Learning Based Approach to Visually Identify Phishing WebpagesYun Lin, Ruofan Liu, Dinil Mon Divakaran, Jun Yang Ng 等USENIX Security 2021 · 被引用 164 次
- Detecting and Characterizing Lateral Phishing at ScaleGrant Ho, Asaf Cidon, Lior Gavish, Marco Schweighauser 等USENIX Security 2019 · 被引用 113 次
- Cognitive Triaging of Phishing AttacksAmber van der Heijden, Luca AllodiUSENIX Security 2019 · 被引用 100 次
相关 Paper
- A Large-Scale Study of Personalized Phishing using Large Language ModelsStefan Czybik, Anne Josiane Kouam, Peter Heubl, Jan Magnus Nold 等USENIX Security 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Paladin: Defending LLM-enabled Phishing Emails with a New Trigger-Tag ParadigmYan Pang, Wenlong Meng, Xiaojing Liao, Tianhao WangNDSS 2026 · 被引用 5 次
- Evaluating LLM-based Personal Information Extraction and CountermeasuresYupei Liu, Yuqi Jia, Jinyuan Jia, Neil Zhenqiang GongUSENIX Security 2025
- SoK: PHILTER: Uncovering Security and Functional Gaps in AI-based Phishing Website Detection Literature via an LLM-based Reasoning FrameworkMahbub Alam, Muhammad Lutfor Rahman, Sonjoy Kumar Paul, Amy W. Hays 等USENIX Security 2026
- From Chatbots to Phishbots?: Phishing Scam Generation in Commercial Large Language ModelsSayak Saha Roy, Poojitha Thota, Krishna Vamsi Naragam, Shirin NilizadehS&P 2024 · 被引用 57 次
