Evaluating LLM-based Personal Information Extraction and Countermeasures
Yupei Liu, Yuqi Jia, Jinyuan Jia, Neil Zhenqiang Gong
摘要
Automatically extracting personal information -- such as name, phone number, and email address -- from publicly available profiles at a large scale is a stepstone to many other security attacks including spear phishing. Traditional methods -- such as regular expression, keyword search, and entity detection -- achieve limited success at such personal information extraction. In this work, we perform a systematic measurement study to benchmark large language model (LLM) based personal information extraction and countermeasures. Towards this goal, we present a framework for LLM-based extraction attacks; collect four datasets including a synthetic dataset generated by GPT-4 and three real-world datasets with manually labeled eight categories of personal information; introduce a novel mitigation strategy based on prompt injection; and systematically benchmark LLM-based attacks and countermeasures using ten LLMs and five datasets. Our key findings include: LLM can be misused by attackers to accurately extract various personal information from personal profiles; LLM outperforms traditional methods; and prompt injection can defend against strong LLM-based attacks, reducing the attack to less effective traditional ones.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper7
- Investigating the Impact of Dark Patterns on LLM-Based Web AgentsDevin Ersoy, Brandon Lee, Ananth Shreekumar, Arjun Arunasalam 等S&P 2026 · 被引用 16 次
- From Fragmentation to Integration: Exploring the Design Space of AI Agents for Human-as-the-Unit Privacy ManagementEryue Xu, Tianshi LiCHI 2026 · 被引用 3 次
- What Does the Server See- Understanding Privacy Leakage from Large Language Models in Split InferenceMingyuan Fan, Yu Liu, Fuyi Wang, Cen ChenCCS 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- LEAKYLINKS: Measuring the Security and Privacy Risks of URL Scanning ServicesAli Mustafa, Jannis Rautenstrauch, Florian Hantke, Shubham Agarwal 等S&P 2026
- What Users Ask, Policies Miss: Unveiling the Gap Between Community-Expressed Privacy Concerns and LLM Provider PoliciesZhihuang Liu, Zhen Huang, Ling Hu, Yifan Yang 等USENIX Security 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper14
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 64,255 次
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger 等ICLR 2020 · 被引用 8,443 次
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu 等ICLR 2022 · 被引用 4,966 次
- Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?Sewon Min, Xinxi Lyu, Ari Holtzman, Mikel Artetxe 等EMNLP 2022 · 被引用 634 次
- Formalizing and Benchmarking Prompt Injection Attacks and DefensesYupei Liu, Yuqi Jia, Runpeng Geng, Jinyuan Jia 等USENIX Security 2024 · 被引用 308 次
相关 Paper
- A Large-Scale Study of Personalized Phishing using Large Language ModelsStefan Czybik, Anne Josiane Kouam, Peter Heubl, Jan Magnus Nold 等USENIX Security 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Can Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks Be Detected and Removed?Yulin Chen, Haoran Li, Yuan Sui, Yufei He 等ACL 2025
- From Chatbots to Phishbots?: Phishing Scam Generation in Commercial Large Language ModelsSayak Saha Roy, Poojitha Thota, Krishna Vamsi Naragam, Shirin NilizadehS&P 2024 · 被引用 57 次
- Teach LLMs to Phish: Stealing Private Information from Language ModelsAshwinee Panda, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Zhengming Zhang, Yaoqing Yang 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 41 次
- Private Investigator: Extracting Personally Identifiable Information from Large Language Models Using Optimized PromptsSeongho Keum, Dongwon Shin, Leo Marchyok, Sanghyun Hong 等USENIX Security 2025
