Instruction Tuning With Loss Over Instructions
Zhengxiang Shi, Adam X. Yang, Bin Wu, Laurence Aitchison, Emine Yilmaz, Aldo Lipani
摘要
Instruction tuning plays a crucial role in shaping the outputs of language models (LMs) to desired styles. In this work, we propose a simple yet effective method, Instruction Modelling (IM), which trains LMs by applying a loss function to the instruction and prompt part rather than solely to the output part. Through experiments across 21 diverse benchmarks, we show that, in many scenarios, IM can effectively improve the LM performance on both NLP tasks (e.g., MMLU, TruthfulQA, and HumanEval) and open-ended generation benchmarks (e.g., MT-Bench and AlpacaEval). Remarkably, in the most advantageous case, IM boosts model performance on AlpacaEval 1.0 by over 100%. We identify two key factors influencing the effectiveness of IM: (1) The ratio between instruction length and output length in the training data; and (2) The number of training examples. We observe that IM is especially beneficial when trained on datasets with lengthy instructions paired with brief outputs, or under the Superficial Alignment Hypothesis (SAH) where a small amount of training examples are used for instruction tuning. Further analysis substantiates our hypothesis that our improvement can be attributed to reduced overfitting to instruction tuning datasets. It is worth noting that we are not proposing as a replacement for current fine-tuning processes. Instead, our work aims to provide practical guidance for instruction tuning LMs, especially in low-resource scenarios.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper13
- Navigating Rifts in Human-LLM Grounding: Study and BenchmarkOmar Shaikh, Hussein Mozannar, Gagan Bansal, Adam Fourney 等ACL 2025 · 被引用 21 次
- MDCure: A Scalable Pipeline for Multi-Document Instruction-FollowingGabrielle Kaili-May Liu, Bowen Shi, Avi Caciularu, Idan Szpektor 等ACL 2025 · 被引用 13 次
- Inverse IFEval: Can LLMs Unlearn Stubborn Training Conventions to Follow Real Instructions?Qinyan Zhang, Xinping Lei, Ruijie Miao, FU YU 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 10 次
- Learning to Instruct for Visual Instruction TuningZhihan Zhou, Feng Hong, Jiaan Luo, Yushi Ye 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 8 次
- Toward Secure Tuning: Mitigating Security Risks from Instruction Fine-TuningYanrui Du, Fenglei Fan, Sendong Zhao, Jiawei Cao 等ACL 2026 · 被引用 7 次
它引用的顶会 Paper37
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 64,255 次
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 24,707 次
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu 等ICLR 2022 · 被引用 18,833 次
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou 等ICLR 2021 · 被引用 7,905 次
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu 等ICLR 2022 · 被引用 4,966 次
相关 Paper
- MAIN: Mutual Alignment Is Necessary for instruction tuningFanyi Yang, Jianfeng Liu, Xin Zhang, Haoyu Liu 等EMNLP 2025
- Evaluating the Zero-shot Robustness of Instruction-tuned Language ModelsJiuding Sun, Chantal Shaib, Byron C. WallaceICLR 2024 · 被引用 75 次
- Long Is More for Alignment: A Simple but Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Instruction Fine-TuningHao Zhao, Maksym Andriushchenko, Francesco Croce, Nicolas FlammarionICML 2024 · 被引用 96 次
- What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction TuningWei Liu, Weihao Zeng, Keqing He, Yong Jiang 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 369 次
- The Unlocking Spell on Base LLMs: Rethinking Alignment via In-Context LearningBill Yuchen Lin, Abhilasha Ravichander, Ximing Lu, Nouha Dziri 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 299 次
