What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuning
Wei Liu, Weihao Zeng, Keqing He, Yong Jiang, Junxian He
摘要
Instruction tuning is a standard technique employed to align large language models to end tasks and user preferences after the initial pretraining phase. Recent research indicates the critical role of data engineering in instruction tuning -when appropriately selected, only limited data is necessary to achieve superior performance. However, we still lack a principled understanding of what makes good instruction tuning data for alignment, and how we should select data automatically and effectively. In this work, we delve deeply into automatic data selection strategies for alignment. We start with controlled studies to measure data across three dimensions: complexity, quality, and diversity, along which we examine existing methods and introduce novel techniques for enhanced data measurement. Subsequently, we propose a simple strategy to select data samples based on the measurement. We present DEITA (short for Data-Efficient Instruction Tuning for Alignment), a series of models fine-tuned from LLaMA and Mistral models using data samples automatically selected with our proposed approach. Empirically, DEITA performs better or on par with the state-of-the-art open-source alignment models with only 6K SFT training data samples -over 10x less than the data used in the baselines. When further trained with direct preference optimization (DPO), DEITA-Mistral-7B + DPO trained with 6K SFT and 10K DPO samples achieve 7.55 MT-Bench and 90.06% AlpacaEval scores. We anticipate this work to provide tools on automatic data selection, facilitating data-efficient alignment. We release our models as well as the selected datasets for future researches to effectively align models more efficiently. 1 * Equal Contribution. Order determined by random dice rolling. Work done during WL and WZ's visit to HKUST.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper129
- LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction TuningMengzhou Xia, Sadhika Malladi, Suchin Gururangan, Sanjeev Arora 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 460 次
- Think-on-Graph: Deep and Responsible Reasoning of Large Language Model on Knowledge GraphJiashuo Sun, Chengjin Xu, Lumingyuan Tang, Saizhuo Wang 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 247 次
- Preference Leakage: A Contamination Problem in LLM-as-a-judgeDawei Li, Renliang Sun, Yue Huang, Ming Zhong 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 150 次
- Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial RegularizerZhihan Liu, Miao Lu, Shenao Zhang, Boyi Liu 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 119 次
- DART-Math: Difficulty-Aware Rejection Tuning for Mathematical Problem-SolvingYuxuan Tong, Xiwen Zhang, Rui Wang, Ruidong Wu 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 116 次
它引用的顶会 Paper15
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 24,707 次
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 10,924 次
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou 等ICLR 2021 · 被引用 7,905 次
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 被引用 3,228 次
- FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work PartitioningTri DaoICLR 2024 · 被引用 2,600 次
相关 Paper
- From Selection to Refinement: Iterative Optimization for Instruction DataHang Hu, Ziyan Liu, Rujie Wen, Ruihui Hou 等ACL 2026
- MAIN: Mutual Alignment Is Necessary for instruction tuningFanyi Yang, Jianfeng Liu, Xin Zhang, Haoyu Liu 等EMNLP 2025
- BRIEF: Bi-level Coreset Selection for Efficient Instruction Tuning in LLMsChaoyuan Shen, Chi Zhang, Chengliang Chai, Jiacheng Wang 等VLDB 2026 · 被引用 2 次
- Not All Documents Are What You Need for Extracting Instruction Tuning DataChi Zhang, Huaping Zhong, Hongtao Li, Chengliang Chai 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 3 次
- Long Is More for Alignment: A Simple but Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Instruction Fine-TuningHao Zhao, Maksym Andriushchenko, Francesco Croce, Nicolas FlammarionICML 2024 · 被引用 96 次
