How Transfeminine TikTok Creators Navigate the Algorithmic Trap of Visibility Via Folk Theorization
Michael Ann DeVito
摘要
Social platforms open important doors to visibility for transgender people, through which they can pursue key goals such as broader recognition and normalization. However, each door is also potentially a trap, filled with risks and consequences - especially for those whose goals require visibility. Via a grounded theory interview study with 17 transfeminine content creators on TikTok, I find that, in an algorithmically mediated environment such as TikTok, users navigate potential doors to visibility and their associated traps via folk theorization. Moreover, I find that transfeminine creators employ multiple complex and overlapping folk theories, with actionable theories guiding the careful navigation of doors to visibility, and demotivational theories alerting creators to traps that are too risky to spring. I introduce five novel folk theories of TikTok spanning both the For You Page and content moderation systems which creators use to guide their decision making, and discuss how two cross-cutting issues, perceived algorithmic paternalism and decontextualization, illustrate major issues for transfeminine creators and opportunities for more supportive design.
问问这篇 Paper
问问你的智能体。
Lune 读过与它相关的顶会 Paper,每个回答都会注明依据哪几篇。
引用它的顶会 Paper29
- "I See Me Here": Mental Health Content, Community, and Algorithmic Curation on TikTokAshlee Milton, Leah Ajmani, Michael Ann DeVito, Stevie ChancellorCHI 2023 · 被引用 115 次
- Cruising Queer HCI on the DL: A Literature Review of LGBTQ+ People in HCIJordan Taylor, Ellen Simpson, Anh-Ton Tran, Jed R. Brubaker 等CHI 2024 · 被引用 55 次
- "Caption It in an Accessible Way That Is Also Enjoyable": Characterizing User-Driven Captioning Practices on TikTokEmma J. McDonnell, Tessa Eagle, Pitch Sinlapanuntakul, Soo Hyun Moon 等CHI 2024 · 被引用 33 次
- Let's Talk Futures: A Literature Review of HCI's Future OrientationCamilo Sanchez, Sui Wang, Kaisa Savolainen, Felix Anand Epp 等CHI 2025 · 被引用 30 次
- Whose Knowledge is Valued? Epistemic Injustice in CSCW ApplicationsLeah Hope Ajmani, Jasmine C. Foriest, Jordan Taylor, Kyle Pittman 等CSCW 2024 · 被引用 29 次
相关 Paper
- Algorithmic Folk Theories and Identity: How TikTok Users Co-Produce Knowledge of Identity and Engage in Algorithmic ResistanceNadia Karizat, Daniel Delmonaco, Motahhare Eslami, Nazanin AndalibiCSCW 2021 · 被引用 338 次
- Entering Doors, Evading Traps: Benefits and Risks of Visibility During Transgender Coming OutsAnthony T. Pinter, Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, Jed R. BrubakerCSCW 2020 · 被引用 42 次
- Adaptive Folk Theorization as a Path to Algorithmic Literacy on Changing PlatformsMichael Ann DeVitoCSCW 2021 · 被引用 143 次
- "They've Over-Emphasized That One Search": Controlling Unwanted Content on TikTok's For You PageJulie A. Vera, Sourojit GhoshCHI 2025 · 被引用 3 次
- "What are you doing, TikTok?" : How Marginalized Social Media Users Perceive, Theorize, and "Prove" ShadowbanningDaniel Delmonaco, Samuel Mayworm, Hibby Thach, Josh Guberman 等CSCW 2024 · 被引用 46 次
