Adaptive Folk Theorization as a Path to Algorithmic Literacy on Changing Platforms
Michael Ann DeVito
摘要
Te increased importance of opaque, algorithmically-driven social platforms (e.g., Facebook, YouTube) to everyday users as a medium for self-presentation effectively requires users to speculate on how platforms work in order to decide how to behave to achieve their self-presentation goals. Tis speculation takes the form of folk theorization. Because platforms constantly change, users must constantly re-evaluate their folk theories. Based on an Asynchronous Remote Community study of LGBTQ+ social platform users with heightened self-presentation concerns, I present an updated model of the folk theorization process to account for platform change. Moreover, I find that both the complexity of the user's folk theorization and their overall relationship with the platform impact this theorization process, and present new concepts for examining and classifying these elements: theorization complexity level and perceived platform spirit. I conclude by proposing a folk theorization-based path towards an extensible algorithmic literacy that would support users in ongoing theorization.
CCS Concepts: •Human-centered computing Collaborative and social computing Empirical studies in collaborative and social computing •Human-centered computing Human computer interaction (HCI) Empirical studies in HCI •Social and professional topics User characteristics
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper21
- The Algorithmic Crystal: Conceptualizing the Self through Algorithmic Personalization on TikTokAngela Y. Lee, Hannah Mieczkowski, Nicole B. Ellison, Jeffrey T. HancockCSCW 2022 · 被引用 127 次
- Toward User-Driven Algorithm Auditing: Investigating users' strategies for uncovering harmful algorithmic behaviorAlicia DeVos, Aditi Dhabalia, Hong Shen, Kenneth Holstein 等CHI 2022 · 被引用 96 次
- "I Got Flagged for Supposed Bullying, Even Though It Was in Response to Someone Harassing Me About My Disability.": A Study of Blind TikTokers' Content Moderation ExperiencesYao Lyu, Jie Cai, Anisa Callis, Kelley Cotter 等CHI 2024 · 被引用 25 次
- Explorable Explainable AI: Improving AI Understanding for Community Health Workers in IndiaIan René Solano-Kamaiko, Dibyendu Mishra, Nicola Dell, Aditya VashisthaCHI 2024 · 被引用 21 次
- Hashtag Re-Appropriation for Audience Control on Recommendation-Driven Social Media Xiaohongshu (rednote)Ruyuan Wan, Lingbo Tong, Tiffany Knearem, Toby Jia-Jun Li 等CHI 2025 · 被引用 19 次
它引用的顶会 Paper1
相关 Paper
- How Transfeminine TikTok Creators Navigate the Algorithmic Trap of Visibility Via Folk TheorizationMichael Ann DeVitoCSCW 2022 · 被引用 125 次
- "What are you doing, TikTok?" : How Marginalized Social Media Users Perceive, Theorize, and "Prove" ShadowbanningDaniel Delmonaco, Samuel Mayworm, Hibby Thach, Josh Guberman 等CSCW 2024 · 被引用 46 次
- Algorithmic Folk Theories and Identity: How TikTok Users Co-Produce Knowledge of Identity and Engage in Algorithmic ResistanceNadia Karizat, Daniel Delmonaco, Motahhare Eslami, Nazanin AndalibiCSCW 2021 · 被引用 338 次
- For You, or For"You"?: Everyday LGBTQ+ Encounters with TikTokEllen Simpson, Bryan C. SemaanCSCW 2020 · 被引用 228 次
- "They've Over-Emphasized That One Search": Controlling Unwanted Content on TikTok's For You PageJulie A. Vera, Sourojit GhoshCHI 2025 · 被引用 3 次
