Lune

CHI2024顶会

Machine Learning Processes As Sources of Ambiguity: Insights from AI Art

Christian Sivertsen, Guido Salimbeni, Anders Sundnes Løvlie, Steven David Benford, Jichen Zhu

2024年份
40被引次数
8顶会引用

摘要

Ongoing efforts to turn Machine Learning (ML) into a design material have encountered limited success. This paper examines the burgeoning area of AI art to understand how artists incorporate ML in their creative work. Drawing upon related HCI theories, we investigate how artists create ambiguity by analyzing nine AI artworks that use computer vision and image synthesis. Our analysis shows that, in addition to the established types of ambiguity, artists worked closely with the ML process (dataset curation, model training, and application) and developed various techniques to evoke the ambiguity of processes. Our finding indicates that the current conceptualization of ML as a design material needs to reframe the ML process as design elements, instead of technical details. Finally, this paper offers reflections on commonly held assumptions in HCI about ML uncertainty, dependability, and explainability, and advocates to supplement the artifact-centered design perspective of ML with a process-centered one.

CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → HCI theory, concepts and models; • Applied computing → Media arts.

问问这篇 Paper

智能体会读完全文。

Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。

可以从这些问题问起

智能体调用

Luneget_paper_fulltext

在 Lune 里问

免费开始,无需绑卡

引用它的顶会 Paper8

问问它们各自怎么用它

它引用的顶会 Paper12

相关 Paper

黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖