DP-Auditorium: A Large-Scale Library for Auditing Differential Privacy
William Kong, Andrés Muñoz Medina, Mónica Ribero, Umar Syed
摘要
New regulations and increased awareness of data privacy have led to the deployment of new and more efficient differentially private mechanisms across both public institutions and industries. With the growing adoption of differential privacy, there is also a risk of introducing bugs into both the derivation of new mechanisms and their implementation. Ensuring these mechanisms is therefore crucial to ensure proper protection of data. However since differential privacy is not a property of a single output of a mechanism but a property of the mechanism itself, testing whether a mechanism is differentially private is not a trivial task. While ad hoc testing techniques exist under specific assumptions, no concerted effort has been made by the research community to develop a flexible and extendable tool for testing differentially private mechanisms. This paper introduces DP-Auditorium as a step advancing research in this direction. The main idea behind DP-Auditorium is to abstract the problem of testing differential privacy into two steps: (1) measuring the distance between distributions, and (2) finding neighboring datasets where a mechanism generates output distributions maximizing such distance. From a technical point of view, we propose three new algorithms for evaluating the distance between distributions. While these algorithms are well-known in the statistics community, we provide new estimation guarantees by leveraging the fact that we are only interested in verifying whether a mechanism is differentially private, and not on obtaining an exact estimate of the distance between two distributions. DP-Auditorium is easily extensible, as demonstrated in this paper by implementing a well-known approximate differential privacy testing algorithm to our library. Finally, we provide an extensive comparison to date of multiple testers across varying sample sizes and differential privacy parameters, demonstrating that there is no single tester that dominates all others, and that in order to ensure proper testing of mechanisms, one requires a combination of different techniques.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper2
- Sequentially Auditing Differential PrivacyTomás González Lara, Mateo Dulce-Rubio, Aaditya Ramdas, Mónica RiberoNeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 6 次
- General-Purpose f-DP Estimation and Auditing in a Black-Box SettingÖnder Askin, Holger Dette, Martin Dunsche, Tim Kutta 等USENIX Security 2025
它引用的顶会 Paper12
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan 等CCS 2016 · 被引用 7,620 次
- Evaluating Differentially Private Machine Learning in PracticeBargav Jayaraman, David EvansUSENIX Security 2019 · 被引用 586 次
- Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning: How Private is Private SGD?Matthew Jagielski, Jonathan R. Ullman, Alina OpreaNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 354 次
- Adversary Instantiation: Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Machine LearningMilad Nasr, Shuang Song, Abhradeep Thakurta, Nicolas Papernot 等S&P 2021 · 被引用 288 次
- GAN-Leaks: A Taxonomy of Membership Inference Attacks against Generative ModelsDingfan Chen, Ning Yu, Yang Zhang, Mario FritzCCS 2020 · 被引用 278 次
相关 Paper
- Testing differential privacy with dual interpretersHengchu Zhang, Edo Roth, Andreas Haeberlen, Benjamin C. Pierce 等OOPSLA 2020 · 被引用 15 次
- Eureka: A General Framework for Black-box Differential Privacy EstimatorsYun Lu, Malik Magdon-Ismail, Yu Wei, Vassilis ZikasS&P 2024 · 被引用 16 次
- Auditing -differential privacy in one runSaeed Mahloujifar, Luca Melis, Kamalika ChaudhuriICML 2025
- Sequential Auditing for f-Differential PrivacyTim Kutta, Martin Dunsche, Yu Wei, Vassilis ZikasUSENIX Security 2026
- Group and Attack: Auditing Differential PrivacyJohan Lokna, Anouk Paradis, Dimitar I. Dimitrov, Martin T. VechevCCS 2023 · 被引用 10 次
