Leave-one-out Distinguishability in Machine Learning
Jiayuan Ye, Anastasia Borovykh, Soufiane Hayou, Reza Shokri
摘要
We introduce an analytical framework to quantify the changes in a machine learning algorithm's output distribution following the inclusion of a few data points in its training set, a notion we define as leave-one-out distinguishability (LOOD). This is key to measuring data memorization and information leakage as well as the influence of training data points in machine learning. We illustrate how our method broadens and refines existing empirical measures of memorization and privacy risks associated with training data. We use Gaussian processes to model the randomness of machine learning algorithms, and validate LOOD with extensive empirical analysis of leakage using membership inference attacks. Our analytical framework enables us to investigate the causes of leakage and where the leakage is high. For example, we analyze the influence of activation functions, on data memorization. Additionally, our method allows us to identify queries that disclose the most information about the training data in the leave-one-out setting. We illustrate how optimal queries can be used for accurate reconstruction of training data.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper8
- Evaluations of Machine Learning Privacy Defenses are MisleadingMichael Aerni, Jie Zhang, Florian TramèrCCS 2024 · 被引用 12 次
- Practical Bayes-Optimal Membership Inference AttacksMarcus Lassila, Johan Östman, Khac-Hoang Ngo, Alexandre Graell i AmatNeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 7 次
- SMOTE and Mirrors: Exposing Privacy Leakage from Synthetic Minority OversamplingGeorgi Ganev, MohammadReza Nazari, Rees Davison, Amirhassan Fallah Dizche 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 6 次
- Learnability and Privacy Vulnerability are Entangled in a Few Critical WeightsXingli Fang, Jung-Eun KimICLR 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Cram Less to Fit More: Training Data Pruning Improves Memorization of FactsJiayuan Ye, Vitaly Feldman, Kunal TalwarICML 2026 · 被引用 1 次
它引用的顶会 Paper20
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn 等ICLR 2021 · 被引用 21,477 次
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 被引用 5,137 次
- Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient DescentGarima Pruthi, Frederick Liu, Satyen Kale, Mukund SundararajanNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 784 次
- What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence EstimationVitaly Feldman, Chiyuan ZhangNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 674 次
- Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning: How Private is Private SGD?Matthew Jagielski, Jonathan R. Ullman, Alina OpreaNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 354 次
相关 Paper
- Enhanced Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning ModelsJiayuan Ye, Aadyaa Maddi, Sasi Kumar Murakonda, Vincent Bindschaedler 等CCS 2022 · 被引用 150 次
- Students Parrot Their Teachers: Membership Inference on Model DistillationMatthew Jagielski, Milad Nasr, Katherine Lee, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 53 次
- SoK: Let the Privacy Games Begin! A Unified Treatment of Data Inference Privacy in Machine LearningAhmed Salem, Giovanni Cherubin, David Evans, Boris Köpf 等S&P 2023
- PANORAMIA: Privacy Auditing of Machine Learning Models without RetrainingMishaal Kazmi, Hadrien Lautraite, Alireza Akbari, Qiaoyue Tang 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 26 次
- The Privacy Onion Effect: Memorization is RelativeNicholas Carlini, Matthew Jagielski, Chiyuan Zhang, Nicolas Papernot 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 175 次
