PBP: Post-training Backdoor Purification for Malware Classifiers
Dung Thuy Nguyen, Ngoc N. Tran, Taylor T. Johnson, Kevin Leach
摘要
In recent years, the rise of machine learning (ML) in cybersecurity has brought new challenges, including the increasing threat of backdoor poisoning attacks on ML malware classifiers. For instance, adversaries could inject malicious samples into public malware repositories, contaminating the training data and potentially misclassifying malware by the ML model. Current countermeasures predominantly focus on detecting poisoned samples by leveraging disagreements within the outputs of a diverse set of ensemble models on training data points. However, these methods are not suitable for scenarios where Machine Learning-as-a-Service (MLaaS) is used or when users aim to remove backdoors from a model after it has been trained. Addressing this scenario, we introduce PBP, a post-training defense for malware classifiers that mitigates various types of backdoor embeddings without assuming any specific backdoor embedding mechanism. Our method exploits the influence of backdoor attacks on the activation distribution of neural networks, independent of the trigger-embedding method. In the presence of a backdoor attack, the activation distribution of each layer is distorted into a mixture of distributions. By regulating the statistics of the batch normalization layers, we can guide a backdoored model to perform similarly to a clean one. Our method demonstrates substantial advantages over several state-of-the-art methods, as evidenced by experiments on two datasets, two types of backdoor methods, and various attack configurations. Notably, our approach requires only a small portion of the training data -- only 1% -- to purify the backdoor and reduce the attack success rate from 100% to almost 0%, a 100-fold improvement over the baseline methods. Our code is available at https://github.com/judydnguyen/pbp-backdoor-purification-official.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper2
- PurMM: Attention-Guided Test-Time Backdoor Purification in Multimodal Large Language ModelsWenzheng Jiang, Ke Liang, Xuankun Rong, Jingxuan Zhou 等AAAI 2026
- CL-Guard: Defending DNNs Against Backdoors via Fine-Grained Neuron Analysis and Collaborative Dual-Network LearningJie Xiao, Yuhao Huang, Yanjiao Gao, Aizhu Liu 等AAAI 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper28
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh 等ICML 2021 · 被引用 47,906 次
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu 等ICLR 2022 · 被引用 4,966 次
- Neural Cleanse: Identifying and Mitigating Backdoor Attacks in Neural NetworksBolun Wang, Yuanshun Yao, Shawn Shan, Huiying Li 等S&P 2019 · 被引用 1,801 次
- Neural Attention Distillation: Erasing Backdoor Triggers from Deep Neural NetworksYige Li, Xixiang Lyu, Nodens Koren, Lingjuan Lyu 等ICLR 2021 · 被引用 548 次
- ABS: Scanning Neural Networks for Back-doors by Artificial Brain StimulationYingqi Liu, Wen-Chuan Lee, Guanhong Tao, Shiqing Ma 等CCS 2019 · 被引用 531 次
相关 Paper
- MM-BD: Post-Training Detection of Backdoor Attacks with Arbitrary Backdoor Pattern Types Using a Maximum Margin StatisticHang Wang, Zhen Xiang, David J. Miller, George KesidisS&P 2024 · 被引用 81 次
- Mitigating Backdoor Attack by Injecting Proactive Defensive BackdoorShaokui Wei, Hongyuan Zha, Baoyuan WuNeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 20 次
- Explanation-Guided Backdoor Poisoning Attacks Against Malware ClassifiersGiorgio Severi, Jim Meyer, Scott E. Coull, Alina OpreaUSENIX Security 2021 · 被引用 186 次
- Not All Benignware Are Alike: Enhancing Clean-Label Attacks on Malware ClassifiersXutong Wang, Yun Feng, Bingsheng Bi, Yaqin Cao 等WWW 2025
- Prototype Guided Backdoor Defense via Activation Space ManipulationVenkat Adithya Amula, Sunayana Samavedam, Saurabh Saini, Avani Gupta 等ICCV 2025 · 被引用 2 次
