Noise and the Frontier of Quantum Supremacy
Adam Bouland, Bill Fefferman, Zeph Landau, Yunchao Liu
摘要
Noise is the defining feature of the NISQ era, but it remains unclear if noisy quantum devices are capable of quantum speedups. Quantum supremacy experiments have been a major step forward, but gaps remain between the theory behind these experiments and their actual implementations. In this work we initiate the study of the complexity of quantum random circuit sampling experiments with realistic amounts of noise. Actual quantum supremacy experiments have high levels of uncorrected noise and exponentially decaying fidelities. It is natural to ask if there is any signal of exponential complexity in these highly noisy devices. Surprisingly, we show that it remains hard to compute the output probabilities of noisy random quantum circuits without error correction. More formally, so long as the noise rate of the device is below the error detection threshold, we show it is #P-hard to compute the output probabilities of random circuits with a constant rate of noise per gate. This hardness persists even though these probabilities are exponentially close to uniform. Therefore the small deviations away from uniformity are hard to compute, formalizing an important intuition behind Google's supremacy claim. Interestingly these hardness results also have implications for the complexity of experiments in a low-noise setting. The issue here is that prior hardness results for computing output proba-bilities of random circuits are not robust enough to imprecision to connect with the Stockmeyer argument for hardness of sampling from circuits with constant fidelity. We exponentially improve the robustness of prior results to imprecision, both in the cases of Random Circuit Sampling and BosonSampling. In the latter case we bring the proven hardness within a constant factor in the exponent of the robustness required for hardness of sampling for the first time. We then show that our results are in tension with one another - the high-noise result implies the low-noise result is essentially optimal, even with generalizations of our techniques.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper4
- A Polynomial-Time Classical Algorithm for Noisy Random Circuit SamplingDorit Aharonov, Xun Gao, Zeph Landau, Yunchao Liu 等STOC 2023 · 被引用 74 次
- Quantum supremacy and hardness of estimating output probabilities of quantum circuitsYasuhiro Kondo, Ryuhei Mori, Ramis MovassaghFOCS 2021 · 被引用 14 次
- Founding Quantum Cryptography on Quantum Advantage, or, Towards Cryptography from #P HardnessDakshita Khurana, Kabir TomerSTOC 2025 · 被引用 2 次
- Exponential improvements to the average-case hardness of BosonSamplingAdam Bouland, Ishaun Datta, Bill Fefferman, Felipe HernandezFOCS 2025 · 被引用 1 次
它引用的顶会 Paper1
相关 Paper
- Polynomial-Time Classical Simulation of Noisy IQP Circuits with Constant DepthJoel Rajakumar, James D. Watson, Yi-Kai LiuSODA 2025 · 被引用 7 次
- Certified Randomness from Quantum SupremacyScott Aaronson, Shih-Han HungSTOC 2023 · 被引用 18 次
- Polynomial-Time Classical Simulation of Noisy Quantum Circuits with Naturally Fault-Tolerant GatesJon Nelson, Joel Rajakumar, Dominik Hangleiter, Michael J. GullansSODA 2026
- Massively Parallel Approximate Simulation of Hard Quantum CircuitsIgor L. Markov, Aneeqa Fatima, Sergei V. Isakov, Sergio BoixoDAC 2020 · 被引用 15 次
- Learning the Complexity of Weakly Noisy Quantum StatesYusen Wu, Bujiao Wu, Yanqi Song, Xiao Yuan 等ICLR 2025
