Directly Optimizing Natural Language Explanations for Behavioral Faithfulness: Simulatability and Recoverability
Advaith Malladi, Shashank Srivastava
摘要
Natural-language explanations are widely used to interpret machine learning models, yet many prioritize human plausibility over accurately reflecting or predicting model behavior. Prior approaches often rely on human-written rationales, producing post-hoc explanations that neither align with the model's decision function nor generalize. We introduce OPEX , a natural-language explanation model that directly optimizes for behavioral faithfulness: the ability of an explanation to reflect and predict a model's observable input-output behavior. OPEX is trained using reinforcement learning with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), optimizing two complementary metrics: recoverability, which measures whether explanations recover model predictions on seen examples, and simulatability, which measures prediction of model behavior on unseen inputs. Across structured and text-based tasks, OPEX achieves high simulatability (∼0.85) and recoverability (∼0.99), outperforming GPT-4o, LLaMA-3.3-70B, MaNtLE, Chain-of-Thought (CoT)-based models, and human-written explanations, despite using an 8B-parameter backbone. Human user studies show a 15% improvement in classification accuracy over competent baselines. Link to Code and OPEX weights: github.com/advaithmall/OPeX
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper7
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 24,707 次
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought PromptingMiles Turpin, Julian Michael, Ethan Perez, Samuel R. BowmanNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 1,792 次
- Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior?Peter Hase, Mohit BansalACL 2020 · 被引用 216 次
- CLUES: A Benchmark for Learning Classifiers using Natural Language ExplanationsRakesh R. Menon, Sayan Ghosh, Shashank SrivastavaACL 2022 · 被引用 13 次
相关 Paper
- Do Models Explain Themselves? Counterfactual Simulatability of Natural Language ExplanationsYanda Chen, Ruiqi Zhong, Narutatsu Ri, Chen Zhao 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 90 次
- UNIREX: A Unified Learning Framework for Language Model Rationale ExtractionAaron Chan, Maziar Sanjabi, Lambert Mathias, Liang Tan 等ICML 2022 · 被引用 48 次
- GRACE: Generative Representation Learning via Contrastive Policy OptimizationJiashuo Sun, Shixuan Liu, Zhaochen Su, Xianrui Zhong 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 7 次
- MaNtLE: Model-agnostic Natural Language ExplainerRakesh R. Menon, Kerem Zaman, Shashank SrivastavaEMNLP 2023 · 被引用 1 次
- Faithful Serum: Mitigating the Faithfulness Gap in Textual Explanations of LLM Decisions via Attribution GuidanceBar Alon, Itamar Zimerman, Lior WolfACL 2026
