Terrapin Attack: Breaking SSH Channel Integrity By Sequence Number Manipulation
Fabian Bäumer, Marcus Brinkmann, Jörg Schwenk
摘要
The SSH protocol provides secure access to network services, particularly remote terminal login and file transfer within organizational networks and to over 15 million servers on the open internet. SSH uses an authenticated key exchange to establish a secure channel between a client and a server, which protects the confidentiality and integrity of messages sent in either direction. The secure channel prevents message manipulation, replay, insertion, deletion, and reordering. At the network level, SSH uses the Binary Packet Protocol over TCP. In this paper, we show that the SSH Binary Packet Protocol is no longer a secure channel: SSH channel integrity (INT-PST, aINT-PTXT, and INT-sfCTF) is broken for three widely used encryption modes. This allows prefix truncation attacks where encrypted packets at the beginning of the SSH channel can be deleted without the client or server noticing it. We demonstrate several real-world applications of this attack. We show that we can fully break SSH extension negotiation (RFC 8308), such that an attacker can downgrade the public key algorithms for user authentication or turn off a new countermeasure against keystroke timing attacks introduced in OpenSSH 9.5. Further, we identify an implementation flaw in AsyncSSH that, together with prefix truncation, allows an attacker to redirect the victim's login into a shell controlled by the attacker. We also performed an internet-wide scan and found that 71.6% of SSH servers support a vulnerable encryption mode, while 63.2% even list it as their preferred choice. We identify two root causes that enable these attacks: First, the SSH handshake supports optional messages that are not authenticated. Second, SSH does not reset message sequence numbers when activating encryption keys. Based on this analysis, we propose effective and backward-compatible changes to SSH that mitigate our attacks.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper4
- Finding SSH Strict Key Exchange Violations by State LearningFabian Bäumer, Marcel Maehren, Marcus Brinkmann, Jörg SchwenkCCS 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- Hop: A Modern Transport and Remote Access ProtocolPaul Flammarion, George Hosono, Wilson Nguyen, Laura Bauman 等USENIX Security 2026
- Crossing the Streams: SSH Plaintext Recovery via a Common Compression Context in Multiplexed ChannelsFabian Bäumer, Marcus BrinkmannCCS 2026
- Catch-22: Uncovering Compromised Hosts using SSH Public KeysCristian Munteanu, Georgios Smaragdakis, Anja Feldmann, Tobias FiebigUSENIX Security 2025
它引用的顶会 Paper4
- SoK: Computer-Aided CryptographyManuel Barbosa, Gilles Barthe, Karthik Bhargavan, Bruno Blanchet 等S&P 2021 · 被引用 169 次
- Transcript Collision Attacks: Breaking Authentication in TLS, IKE and SSHKarthikeyan Bhargavan, Gaëtan LeurentNDSS 2016 · 被引用 128 次
- A Surfeit of SSH Cipher SuitesMartin R. Albrecht, Jean Paul Degabriele, Torben Brandt Hansen, Kenneth G. PatersonCCS 2016 · 被引用 36 次
- SAPIC+: protocol verifiers of the world, unite!Vincent Cheval, Charlie Jacomme, Steve Kremer, Robert KünnemannUSENIX Security 2022
相关 Paper
- Post-Quantum Cryptographic Analysis of SSHBenjamin Bencina, Benjamin Dowling, Varun Maram, Keita XagawaS&P 2025
- "Make Sure DSA Signing Exponentiations Really are Constant-Time"Cesar Pereida García, Billy Bob Brumley, Yuval YaromCCS 2016 · 被引用 93 次
- Passive SSH Key Compromise via LatticesKeegan Ryan, Kaiwen He, George Arnold Sullivan, Nadia HeningerCCS 2023 · 被引用 8 次
- Downgrade Resilience in Key-Exchange ProtocolsKarthikeyan Bhargavan, Christina Brzuska, Cédric Fournet, Matthew Green 等S&P 2016 · 被引用 54 次
- Practical Privacy-Preserving Authentication for SSHLawrence Roy, Stanislav Lyakhov, Yeongjin Jang, Mike RosulekUSENIX Security 2022
