An Optimized Franz-Parisi Criterion and its Equivalence with SQ Lower Bounds
Siyu Chen, Theodor Misiakiewicz, Ilias Zadik, Peiyuan Zhang
摘要
Bandeira et al (The Franz–Parisi (FP) criterion and computational trade-offs in high dimensional statistics Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 33831–44) introduced the FP criterion for characterizing the computational hard phases in statistical detection problems. The FP criterion, based on an annealed version of the celebrated FP potential from statistical physics, was shown to be equivalent to low-degree polynomial lower bounds for Gaussian additive models (GAMs), thereby connecting two distinct approaches to understanding the computational hardness in statistical inference. In this paper, we propose a refined FP criterion that aims to better capture the geometric ‘overlap’ structure of statistical models. Our main result establishes that this optimized FP criterion is equivalent to statistical query (SQ) lower bounds—another foundational framework in computational complexity of statistical inference. Crucially, this equivalence holds under a mild, verifiable assumption satisfied by a broad class of statistical models, including GAMs, planted sparse models, as well as non-Gaussian component analysis (NGCA), single-index (SI) models, and convex truncation detection settings. For instance, in the case of convex truncation tasks, the assumption is equivalent with the Gaussian correlation inequality (Royen, 2014) from convex geometry. In addition to the above, our equivalence not only unifies and simplifies the derivation of several known SQ lower bounds–such as for the NGCA model and the SI model–but also yields new SQ lower bounds of independent interest, including for the computational gaps in mixed sparse linear regression (mSLR) and convex truncation.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper3
- The Franz-Parisi Criterion and Computational Trade-offs in High Dimensional StatisticsAfonso S. Bandeira, Ahmed El Alaoui, Samuel B. Hopkins, Tselil Schramm 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 51 次
- Testing Convex TruncationAnindya De, Shivam Nadimpalli, Rocco A. ServedioSODA 2023 · 被引用 3 次
- Can Neural Networks Achieve Optimal Computational-statistical Tradeoff? An Analysis on Single-Index ModelSiyu Chen, Beining Wu, Miao Lu, Zhuoran Yang 等ICLR 2025
相关 Paper
- SQ Lower Bounds for Non-Gaussian Component Analysis with Weaker AssumptionsIlias Diakonikolas, Daniel Kane, Lisheng Ren, Yuxin SunNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 17 次
- Sum-of-Squares Lower Bounds for Non-Gaussian Component AnalysisIlias Diakonikolas, Sushrut Karmalkar, Shuo Pang, Aaron PotechinFOCS 2024 · 被引用 1 次
- PTF Testing Lower Bounds for Non-Gaussian Component AnalysisIlias Diakonikolas, Daniel M. Kane, Sihan Liu, Thanasis PittasFOCS 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- Computational and Statistical Tradeoffs in Inferring Combinatorial Structures of Ising ModelYing Jin, Zhaoran Wang, Junwei LuICML 2020 · 被引用 2 次
- A Unified Approach to Memory-Sample Tradeoffs for Detecting Planted StructuresSumegha Garg, Jabari Hastings, Chirag Pabbaraju, Vatsal SharanSTOC 2026 · 被引用 1 次
