A Unified Approach to Memory-Sample Tradeoffs for Detecting Planted Structures
Sumegha Garg, Jabari Hastings, Chirag Pabbaraju, Vatsal Sharan
摘要
We present a unified framework for proving memory lower bounds for multi‐pass streaming algorithms that detect planted structures. Planted structures — such as cliques or bicliques in graphs, and sparse signals in high-dimensional data — arise in numerous applications, and our framework yields multi-pass memory lower bounds for many such fundamental settings. We show memory lower bounds for the planted k-biclique detection problem in random bipartite graphs and for detecting sparse Gaussian means. We also show the first memory-sample tradeoffs for the sparse principal component analysis (PCA) problem in the spiked covariance model. For all these problems to which we apply our unified framework, we obtain bounds which are nearly tight in the low, O(logn) memory regime. We also leverage our bounds to establish new multi-pass streaming lower bounds, in the vertex arrival model, for two well-studied graph streaming problems: approximating the size of the largest biclique and approximating the maximum density of bounded-size subgraphs. To show these bounds, we study a general distinguishing problem over matrices, where the goal is to distinguish a null distribution from one that plants an outlier distribution over a random submatrix. Our analysis builds on a new distributed data processing inequality that provides sufficient conditions for memory hardness in terms of the likelihood ratio between the averaged planted and null distributions. This result generalizes the inequality of [Braverman et al., STOC 2016] and may be of independent interest. The inequality enables us to measure information cost under the null distribution – a key step for applying subsequent direct-sum-type arguments and incorporating the multi-pass information cost framework of [Braverman et al., STOC 2024]. Finally, to instantiate our framework in concrete settings, we derive bounds on the likelihood ratio between the planted and null distributions using careful truncations.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper8
- All-or-nothing statistical and computational phase transitions in sparse spiked matrix estimationJean Barbier, Nicolas Macris, Cynthia RushNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 42 次
- Space Lower Bounds for Approximating Maximum Matching in the Edge Arrival ModelMichael KapralovSODA 2021 · 被引用 15 次
- The Coin Problem with Applications to Data StreamsMark Braverman, Sumegha Garg, David P. WoodruffFOCS 2020 · 被引用 14 次
- Oja's Algorithm for Streaming Sparse PCASyamantak Kumar, Purnamrita SarkarNeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 13 次
- Sparse PCA: Algorithms, Adversarial Perturbations and CertificatesTommaso d'Orsi, Pravesh K. Kothari, Gleb Novikov, David SteurerFOCS 2020 · 被引用 13 次
相关 Paper
- Graph streaming lower bounds for parameter estimation and property testing via a streaming XOR lemmaSepehr Assadi, Vishvajeet NSTOC 2021 · 被引用 12 次
- A New Information Complexity Measure for Multi-pass Streaming with ApplicationsMark Braverman, Sumegha Garg, Qian Li, Shuo Wang 等STOC 2024
- Multi-Pass Streaming Lower Bounds for Approximating Max-CutYumou Fei, Dor Minzer, Shuo WangFOCS 2025 · 被引用 10 次
- Multi-Pass Graph Streaming Lower Bounds for Cycle Counting, MAX-CUT, Matching Size, and Other ProblemsSepehr Assadi, Gillat Kol, Raghuvansh R. Saxena, Huacheng YuFOCS 2020 · 被引用 19 次
- Streaming Lower Bounds and Asymmetric Set-DisjointnessShachar Lovett, Jiapeng ZhangFOCS 2023 · 被引用 3 次
